MétaCan
Menu
← Back to cohort

Study of the state of th vascular endothelium in various forms of coronary heart disease

2023· article· en· W4386770380 on OpenAlexaboutno aff
F. A. Shukurov, M. S. Tabarov, Z. M. Toshtemirova, M. Kh. Khodzhaeva

Bibliographic record

VenueBulletin of the Medical Institute REAVIZ (REHABILITATION DOCTOR AND HEALTH) · 2023
Typearticle
Languageen
FieldMedicine
TopicBlood Pressure and Hypertension Studies
Canadian institutionsnot available
Fundersnot available
KeywordsMedicineInternal medicineMyocardial infarctionCardiologyAnginaBody mass indexCoronary heart diseaseDiabetes mellitusEndocrinology

Abstract

fetched live from OpenAlex

Purpose of the study: to investigate changes in markers of endothelial dysfunction and hemostasis system in patients with different forms of CHD on the background of treatment and before it. Materials and methods of the study. In order to fulfill the set tasks, 60 patients with different forms of CHD: stenocardia and myocardial infarction (according to the classification of the Canadian Association of Cardiology (L. Cam-peau, 1976)), 60 patients with different forms of CHD were examined during the study. Campeau, 1976), VNOC (2004), recommendations of the European Society of Cardiology (2007)), aged from 50 to 75 years (mean age 62.6 ± 3.5 and 65.1 ± 3.6 years, respectively) and 20 practically healthy individuals (without signs of CHD), comparable in age (mean age 62.7 ± 3.7 years), who constituted the control group. For comparative analysis of the results before and after treatment the subjects were divided into three groups: Group I - control group, respondents without CHD; Group II - patients with stable angina II and III functional classes (FC); Group III - patients with postinfarction cardiosclerosis, i.e. those who had undergone Ml. Results and their discussion Several risk factors were identified in the majority of hospitalized patients. CHD of II and III FC was more often registered in women (60%); men who had undergone myocardial infarction accounted for 63.3%, the indices were statistically insignificant (p >0.05). The main cardiovascular risk factors (obesity, arterial hypertension, body mass index and total cholesterol) were significantly higher (in % ratio) in patients of groups ll-lll compared to group I (p<0.001), but the cholesterol content and body mass index were on average higher in group II (4.5 ± 1.0 and 33.0 ± 1.3, respectively) than in group III (4.2 ±1.1 and 30.6 ± 2.6, respectively). As for the duration of the disease, group III patients were characterized by a longer history and a higher frequency of heart failure, i.e. patients in this group had a more severe clinical status (p > 0.05). It should be noted that of the total number of patients (n = 80), rural residents accounted for 46.25% and city dwellers for 53.75%. ConclusionsThe presence of a higher degree of endothelial dysfunction is observed in patients who underwent myocardial infarction, in contrast to the stable form of angina pectoris without myocardial infarction in the anamnesis. The progression and deterioration of vascular endothelium is mostly associated with the presence of hyperhomocysteinemia, and the most pronounced changes in endothelial function are determined in patients with a combination of cardiovascular risk factors. In different forms of CHD the increased content of DEK and homocysteine in blood serum, increasing in parallel with the severity of clinical course, their level correlates with the degree of endothelial dysfunction. A direct correlation between hemostasis markers (von-Willebrand factor, fibrinogen and platelets) and DEK was revealed. The greatest changes in vascular-thrombocytic and coagulation hemostasis are observed in patients with IMI than in patients with stenocardia.

Fetched live from OpenAlex and de-inverted. Abstracts are not stored in this database: the inverted indexes are 8.6 GB of the frame’s 9.3 GB of text, and the host has 13 GB free.

How this classification was reachedexpand

Full frame machine prediction

Teacher imitation

Not calibrated prevalence, not ground truth. Human validation pending. The Gemma side is a direct model label for every work in the frame, read from the title-only record. The Codex side is a classifier learned from the 10,348 direct Codex labels and calibrated to design-weighted sample rates; fields without enough sample support carry no Codex call. Candidate is the union of the two sides; consensus is their intersection. These outputs are machine_predicted_unvalidated and are not human labels.

metaresearch head score (Codex)0.000
metaresearch head score (Gemma)0.001
Version: metacan-v3-hybrid-931329e0061cValidation status: machine_predicted_unvalidated
Candidate categoriesnone
Consensus categoriesnone
DomainCandidate signal: none · Consensus signal: none
Study designCandidate signal: Observational · Consensus signal: Observational
GenreCandidate signal: Empirical · Consensus signal: Empirical
Teacher disagreement score0.001
Threshold uncertainty score0.003

Distilled classifier scores by category (both heads)

CategoryCodexGemma
Metaresearch0.0000.001
Meta-epidemiology (narrow)0.0000.000
Meta-epidemiology (broad)0.0000.000
Bibliometrics0.0000.000
Science and technology studies0.0000.000
Scholarly communication0.0000.000
Open science0.0000.000
Research integrity0.0000.000
Insufficient payload (model declined to judge)0.0010.000

Machine scores (provisional)

The two teacher heads of the student model, read on this work. A score orders the frame for review; it never asserts a category, and the validation status ships verbatim with every row.

Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed, 7 training rounds). Scores rank; they never assert a category.

Opus teacher head0.035
GPT teacher head0.323
Teacher spread0.288 · how far apart the two teachers sit on this one work
Validation statusscore_only:v0-immature-baseline · verbatim from the scoring run: score_only means the number may rank works, and no category label ships from it

Classification

machine, unvalidated

Machine predicted; a candidate call from one source (direct Gemma or distilled Codex), not a consensus.

The models applied no category: nothing in the taxonomy fit this work.
Study designObservational
Domainnot available
GenreEmpirical

How this classification was reached, model by model and score by score, is at the end of the page under "How this classification was reached".

Quick stats

Citations1
Published2023
Admission routes1
Has abstractyes

Explore more

Same venueBulletin of the Medical Institute REAVIZ (REHABILITATION DOCTOR AND HEALTH)→Same topicBlood Pressure and Hypertension Studies→French-language works237,207→