Interruption of Urban Style of Old Baghdad’s Hub: A Case Study of the Urban Fabric of Historic Baghdad- Al Rusafa
Bibliographic record
Abstract
This study examines the role of urban style in preserving the memory, cultural heritage, and social values of a city, with a particular focus on Baghdad.Previous research has primarily addressed architectural styles; however, this paper argues for the importance of studying urban style, a concept shaped by the amalgamation of various architectural styles over time, contributing to a city's unique identity and language.The research scrutinizes the rich historical tapestry of Baghdad, a city with a diverse array of historical structures from different periods, collectively constituting its cultural and artistic heritage.However, the urban landscape has been adversely affected by the multiplication of disparate visual images, leading to a disconnection between historical buildings and urban style within the city's historical axes.Therefore, the research problem emerged (what caused the interruption in the relationship between the historical buildings and urban style within the historical axes).The aim of the research represented in (clarifying the concept of urban style and its relationship to historical buildings within the general urban scene found around those buildings and the old Baghdad's centre).And achieving this aim was through the hypothesis of the research (interruption occurs in the urban style as a result of the sudden appearance of multiple visual images within the urban scene), then the research reached a set of recommendations and conclusions in defining the relationship between the style and the historical structures and spatially adapted it to the urban scene of the region.
Fetched live from OpenAlex and de-inverted. Abstracts are not stored in this database: the inverted indexes are 8.6 GB of the frame’s 9.3 GB of text, and the host has 13 GB free.
How this classification was reachedexpand
Full frame machine prediction
Teacher imitationNot calibrated prevalence, not ground truth. Human validation pending. The Gemma side is a direct model label for every work in the frame, read from the title-only record. The Codex side is a classifier learned from the 10,348 direct Codex labels and calibrated to design-weighted sample rates; fields without enough sample support carry no Codex call. Candidate is the union of the two sides; consensus is their intersection. These outputs are machine_predicted_unvalidated and are not human labels.
Distilled classifier scores by category (both heads)
| Category | Codex | Gemma |
|---|---|---|
| Metaresearch | 0.001 | 0.001 |
| Meta-epidemiology (narrow) | 0.000 | 0.001 |
| Meta-epidemiology (broad) | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Bibliometrics | 0.001 | 0.002 |
| Science and technology studies | 0.012 | 0.006 |
| Scholarly communication | 0.003 | 0.001 |
| Open science | 0.002 | 0.003 |
| Research integrity | 0.001 | 0.002 |
| Insufficient payload (model declined to judge) | 0.005 | 0.000 |
Machine scores (provisional)
The two teacher heads of the student model, read on this work. A score orders the frame for review; it never asserts a category, and the validation status ships verbatim with every row.
Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed, 7 training rounds). Scores rank; they never assert a category.
score_only:v0-immature-baseline · verbatim from the scoring run: score_only means the number may rank works, and no category label ships from itClassification
machine, unvalidatedMachine predicted; a candidate call from one source (direct Gemma or distilled Codex), not a consensus.
How this classification was reached, model by model and score by score, is at the end of the page under "How this classification was reached".