MétaCan
Menu
Back to cohort
Record W4386778427 · doi:10.2979/vic.2022.a901299

Irish Famines before and after the Great Hunger ed. by Christine Kinealy and Gerard Moran (review)

2022· article· en· W4386778427 on OpenAlex
Michael de Nie

Why this work is in the frame

A frame that forgets how it found something cannot be audited. These are the routes that admitted this work.

aboutThe title or abstract carries a Canadian signal from the geographic lexicon.
no affNo Canadian affiliation: this work is invisible to an affiliation-only frame.
No Canadian affiliation. An affiliation-only frame, the usual design, would never have seen this work. It is one of the works that make the case for inverting the frame.

Bibliographic record

VenueVictorian Studies · 2022
Typearticle
Languageen
FieldSocial Sciences
TopicInsurance, Mortality, Demography, Risk Management
Canadian institutionsnot available
Fundersnot available
KeywordsFamineIrishSubsistence agricultureTheme (computing)HistoryEconomic historySociologyPhilosophyArchaeologyAgriculture

Abstract

fetched live from OpenAlex

Reviewed by: Irish Famines before and after the Great Hunger ed. by Christine Kinealy and Gerard Moran Michael de Nie (bio) Irish Famines before and after the Great Hunger, edited by Christine Kinealy and Gerard Moran; pp. xxxviii + 352. Hamden, Connecticut: Quinnipiac University Press, 2020, $25.00. Reviewing collected volumes can be tricky. At their best, such books offer a series of strong, interconnected essays that speak to one another and collectively move forward their field of inquiry. Weaker examples of the genre can be uneven in quality and tone, with chapters that offer relatively few connections to each other or even to the central theme of the book. The volume under review, edited by two well-established scholars of the Great Famine, falls somewhere in the middle of these poles. On the whole, Irish Famines before and after the Great Hunger makes a valuable contribution to the field of Irish famine studies, broadening our understanding and appreciation of subsistence crises in Ireland beyond the now much-studied Great Hunger. The book makes its strongest and most original contributions in regard to three topics in particular: the experiences of famine migrants in Canada, the subsistence crisis of 1879 to 1882 (the “Forgotten Famine”), and the role played by the transatlantic press in famine relief and migration schemes. At the same time, it also contains some essays that feel underdeveloped or loosely tied to the theme. The essays are grouped into five more or less chronological sections, exploring famine and related topics before the Great Hunger, famine migration to Canada, food shortage and emigration from 1879 to 1882, hunger-related topics after 1900, and interpreting and teaching the famine today. Taken together, the essays in the first section usefully illuminate some important continuities in the history of Irish subsistence crises and the contemporary responses, exploring themes such as harvest failure and Ireland’s economic relationship to Britain, debates over relieving immediate distress versus responding to famine with long-term development projects, crime and social relations in the midst of famine, and Irish migrants’ role in creating hybrid cultures in their new homeland. These are solid themes, if somewhat unevenly presented. The following section on Canada and famine migration is rather stronger. For example, Laura J. Smith’s essay on transporting indigent Irish emigrants to Canada traces the dispersal of newly arrived migrants from the ports to Canada’s interior before and during the famine, offering important context for better understanding Irish settlement in the nineteenth century. Essays by Mark McGowan and Jason King both offer new perspectives on the infamous migration experiences of Major Denis Mahon’s tenants from Strokestown, demonstrating through careful research that long-held assumptions about their voyage and Mahon’s behavior are due for revision. King’s essay also illuminates how key elements of the popular memory of these people were formed at the time via the transatlantic press. The essays together offer an excellent case study of how transatlantic flows of migrants and information operated and influenced each other. The next six essays are concerned with the “Forgotten Famine” from 1879 to 1882, focusing in particular on two topics: the American response to Irish distress and James Hack Tuke’s emigration scheme. Harvey Strum’s chapter on the campaign to send an American warship with humanitarian aid to Ireland in 1880 is, like Smith’s, a model of the ideal essay to include in these types of collections—a well-researched, detailed, and cohesive short case study that both speaks to the overall theme of the book and points a way forward for further study. Catherine Shannon’s essay is similarly notable, [End Page 140] examining Land League fundraising campaigns in New England between 1879 and 1882, especially in the context of tours by Charles Stewart Parnell, Michael Davitt, and others. As Shannon demonstrates, while the bulk of the funds raised in this period were devoted to the League’s relief fund for suffering tenants, the tours also raised substantial revenue for the League’s political activities, helping to cement the critically important dynamic of Irish-American financial support for nationalist politicians in Ireland. This flow of funds deeply influenced Irish politics and Anglo-Irish relations...

Fetched live from OpenAlex and de-inverted. Abstracts are not stored in this database: the inverted indexes are 8.6 GB of the frame’s 9.3 GB of text, and the host has 13 GB free.

Full frame distilled prediction

Teacher imitation

Not calibrated prevalence, not ground truth. Human validation pending. Learned from the 10,348 direct Codex labels and 10,348 direct Gemma labels. Candidate is the union of thresholded teacher heads; consensus is their intersection. These outputs are machine_predicted_unvalidated and are not human labels or direct frontier model labels.

metaresearch head score (Codex)0.001
metaresearch head score (Gemma)0.000
Version: codex-gemma-dda1882f352aValidation status: machine_predicted_unvalidated
Candidate categoriesScience and technology studies
Consensus categoriesnone
DomainCandidate signal: none · Consensus signal: none
Study designCandidate signal: Not applicable · Consensus signal: Not applicable
GenreCandidate signal: Empirical · Consensus signal: none
Teacher disagreement score0.389
Threshold uncertainty score1.000

Codex and Gemma teacher scores by category

CategoryCodexGemma
Metaresearch0.0010.000
Meta-epidemiology (narrow)0.0000.000
Meta-epidemiology (broad)0.0000.000
Bibliometrics0.0000.000
Science and technology studies0.0020.001
Scholarly communication0.0000.000
Open science0.0000.000
Research integrity0.0000.000
Insufficient payload (model declined to judge)0.0000.000

Machine scores (provisional)

The two teacher heads of the student model, read on this work. A score orders the frame for review; it never asserts a category, and the validation status ships verbatim with every row.

Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed, 7 training rounds). Scores rank; they never assert a category.

Opus teacher head0.014
GPT teacher head0.301
Teacher spread0.286 · how far apart the two teachers sit on this one work
Validation statusscore_only:v0-immature-baseline · verbatim from the scoring run: score_only means the number may rank works, and no category label ships from it