MétaCan
Menu
Back to cohort

Abstract PO-031: Integrated bioinformatics and functional spatial analysis platform for the discovery of predictive biomarkers in oral cancer

2023· article· en· W4386784371 on OpenAlexaboutno aff
Michael M. Allevato, Lisa Chionis, Joshua D. Smith, Santhoshi Krishnan, Leanne E. Henry, Tingting Qin, Janice L. Farlow, Laura S. Rozek, Jonathan Mchugh, Arvind Rao, Maureen A. Sartor, Steven B. Chinn

Bibliographic record

VenueClinical Cancer Research · 2023
Typearticle
Languageen
FieldMedicine
TopicFerroptosis and cancer prognosis
Canadian institutionsnot available
Fundersnot available
KeywordsImmune systemProportional hazards modelImmunotherapyCancerOncologyTumor microenvironmentMedicineSurvival analysisCancer immunotherapyInternal medicineBioinformaticsBiologyImmunology

Abstract

fetched live from OpenAlex

Abstract Background: Oral cavity squamous cell carcinoma (OCSCC) has an unpredictable response to immunotherapy, and standard biomarkers evaluating the tumor immune microenvironment (TIME) lack widespread translational applicability. Defining the TIME is critical to understanding mechanisms and allows the development of reproducible and accurate prognostic and predictive biomarkers based on immune profiles; however, to date, this remains elusive for clinical use. To further study and deconstruct the TIME within OCSCC, we integrated our previously developed computational spatial analysis (CSA) with in-silico deconvolution analyses to comprehensively study the TIME in OCSCC. Methods: We leveraged access to two independent OCSCC cohorts (UM and TCGA) with paired bulk RNASeq, WES, and CSA-immune score data. TMB, neoantigen load, and deconvolution analysis (CIBERSORTx) were performed to generate in silico immune profiles. A previously described CSA evaluates the density and distribution of tumor-infiltrating lymphocytes (TILs) relative to cancer cells to generate immune scores (GCross function [GFx]). GFx scores were then correlated with WES and RNASeq-derived cell-type deconvolution results, immune cell activation expression signatures, and gene expression-based radiosensitivity index scores. Pearson's correlation coefficient and associated p-value were calculated for each comparison. Cox proportional hazards multivariate regression was performed using the entire cohort for survival and recurrence analysis. Results: Here, we better characterize the immunologic tumor environment by objectively measuring the TIL density in spatial relationships with cancer cells. We found that immunoreactive tumors with high GFx scores are highly prognostic for overall survival, with the lowest tiers associated with poor survival. Combining the spatial relationship with immunogenomics (WES and RNASeq immune profiles) increased the prognostic capability of the integrated bioinformatics analysis model. In addition, we further revealed that lymphocyte-infiltrated regions, specifically CD8+ T-cells, are associated with TMB, neoantigen load, and improved overall survival. Conclusion: This study provides an integrated dataset from which to generate future insights and possible immunomodulatory therapies to counteract the poor immunogenicity of OCSCC. We show that integrating computational spatial analysis and in-silico deconvolution analysis is generalizable to multiple patient populations with different demographic compositions and pathology images collected from distinctive digitization methods. Our machine-learning approaches provide clinically actionable predictions that confirm the relevance of these biomarkers with immune cell infiltration and suggest the role of digital pathology profiling in predicting response to immunotherapy which could inform treatments for oral squamous carcinoma patients. Citation Format: Michael M. Allevato, Lisa Chionis, Joshua Smith, Santhoshi Krishnan, Leanne Henry, Tingting Qin, Janice Farlow, Laura Rozek, Jonathan Mchugh, Arvind Rao, Maureen Sartor, Steven B. Chinn. Integrated bioinformatics and functional spatial analysis platform for the discovery of predictive biomarkers in oral cancer [abstract]. In: Proceedings of the AACR-AHNS Head and Neck Cancer Conference: Innovating through Basic, Clinical, and Translational Research; 2023 Jul 7-8; Montreal, QC, Canada. Philadelphia (PA): AACR; Clin Cancer Res 2023;29(18_Suppl):Abstract nr PO-031.

Fetched live from OpenAlex and de-inverted. Abstracts are not stored in this database: the inverted indexes are 8.6 GB of the frame’s 9.3 GB of text, and the host has 13 GB free.

How this classification was reachedexpand

Full frame machine prediction

Teacher imitation

Not calibrated prevalence, not ground truth. Human validation pending. The Gemma side is a direct model label for every work in the frame, read from the title-only record. The Codex side is a classifier learned from the 10,348 direct Codex labels and calibrated to design-weighted sample rates; fields without enough sample support carry no Codex call. Candidate is the union of the two sides; consensus is their intersection. These outputs are machine_predicted_unvalidated and are not human labels.

metaresearch head score (Codex)0.001
metaresearch head score (Gemma)0.002
Version: metacan-v3-hybrid-931329e0061cValidation status: machine_predicted_unvalidated
Candidate categoriesnone
Consensus categoriesnone
DomainCandidate signal: none · Consensus signal: none
Study designCandidate signal: Simulation or modeling · Consensus signal: none
GenreCandidate signal: Methods · Consensus signal: Methods
Teacher disagreement score0.005
Threshold uncertainty score0.017

Distilled classifier scores by category (both heads)

CategoryCodexGemma
Metaresearch0.0010.002
Meta-epidemiology (narrow)0.0010.000
Meta-epidemiology (broad)0.0010.001
Bibliometrics0.0010.001
Science and technology studies0.0000.000
Scholarly communication0.0010.001
Open science0.0010.001
Research integrity0.0010.001
Insufficient payload (model declined to judge)0.0050.002

Machine scores (provisional)

The two teacher heads of the student model, read on this work. A score orders the frame for review; it never asserts a category, and the validation status ships verbatim with every row.

Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed, 7 training rounds). Scores rank; they never assert a category.

Opus teacher head0.246
GPT teacher head0.492
Teacher spread0.246 · how far apart the two teachers sit on this one work
Validation statusscore_only:v0-immature-baseline · verbatim from the scoring run: score_only means the number may rank works, and no category label ships from it

Classification

machine, unvalidated

Machine predicted; a candidate call from one source (direct Gemma or distilled Codex), not a consensus.

The models applied no category: nothing in the taxonomy fit this work.
Study designSimulation or modeling
Domainnot available
GenreMethods

How this classification was reached, model by model and score by score, is at the end of the page under "How this classification was reached".

Quick stats

Citations0
Published2023
Admission routes1
Has abstractyes

Explore more

Same venueClinical Cancer ResearchSame topicFerroptosis and cancer prognosisFrench-language works237,207