MétaCan
Menu
Back to cohort

Abstract PO-043: Development of an automated multi-objective model utilizing delta radiomics to predict locoregional recurrence in head and neck cancer patients treated with primary radiation

2023· article· en· W4386784411 on OpenAlexaboutno aff
Bryan Renslo, Ethan M. Kallenberger, Patrick Ioerger, K. Guida, Oluwatobiloba Ige, Omar A. Karadaghy, Gregory N. Gan, Zhiguo Zhou, Andrés M. Bur

Bibliographic record

VenueClinical Cancer Research · 2023
Typearticle
Languageen
FieldMedicine
TopicRadiomics and Machine Learning in Medical Imaging
Canadian institutionsnot available
Fundersnot available
KeywordsMedicineRadiation therapyHead and neck squamous-cell carcinomaHead and neck cancerRadiomicsCancerRadiologyInternal medicine

Abstract

fetched live from OpenAlex

Abstract Head and neck squamous cell carcinoma (HNSCC) is the sixth most common cancer globally and is frequently treated with definitive radiotherapy. However, 15-50% of patients experience locoregional recurrence (LRR) within 3 years of treatment. The majority of recurrences develop within the first 2 years. Machine learning and deep learning have been utilized to predict oncologic treatment outcomes with high accuracy. Accurate prediction allows for the identification of high-risk patients prior to recurrence, allowing for more intensified monitoring and increased likelihood of long-term disease control. Radiomics is the extraction of quantitative data from radiologic images and provides information that is imperceptible to the human eye. Prior studies have successfully utilized pre- or post-treatment contrast enhanced CT (CECT) images to predict treatment outcomes in HNSCC in machine learning models. In this study, we utilize pre-treatment CECT radiomic features to build an automated multi-objective (AutoMO) model to predict LRR for patients with HNSCC treated with definitive radiotherapy. Patients with primary laryngeal, oropharyngeal, or hypopharyngeal cancer treated with primary radiotherapy from January 2018 through November 2020 were identified. Patients were excluded if they did not have a pre-treatment CECT within 3 months of initiation or a post-treatment CECT within 1-6 months of completion of radiotherapy. Pre- and post-treatment CECT scans as well as clinical information, including locoregional recurrence or progression within two years, were collected retrospectively. Pre-treatment CECT scans contoured for gross tumor volume (GTV) were also collected, which were utilized as the ground-truth reference for auto-contouring of pre-treatment scans. An AutoMO model was developed that maximizes both sensitivity and specificity simultaneously, offering more balanced results as compared to a model that reports the traditional area under the curve (AUC) metric. Following CECT image pre-processing, 275 radiomic features including intensity, texture and geometry were extracted in 3-dimensional volume from pre-treatment CECT scans. Image features were fed into the AutoMO model. 3-fold cross validation was performed, and hyperparameters were tuned to optimize model results. A total of 70 patients met inclusion criteria. The population was 81.4% male (n=57) with an average age of 64.4. Of all patients 22 (31.4%) were positive for recurrence or progression. The model achieved a sensitivity of 0.55, specificity of 0.83, accuracy of 0.79, and AUC of 0.65. The AutoMO model was moderately accurate for predicting recurrence or progression for patients with HNSCC utilizing pre-treatment CECT radiomics. Future iterations integrating clinical data, post-treatment images, and an increased sample size should improve model accuracy. Citation Format: Bryan Renslo, Ethan Kallenberger, Patrick Ioerger, Kenny Guida, Oluwatobiloba Ige, Omar Karadaghy, Gregory Gan, Zhiguo Zhou, Andres Bur. Development of an automated multi-objective model utilizing delta radiomics to predict locoregional recurrence in head and neck cancer patients treated with primary radiation [abstract]. In: Proceedings of the AACR-AHNS Head and Neck Cancer Conference: Innovating through Basic, Clinical, and Translational Research; 2023 Jul 7-8; Montreal, QC, Canada. Philadelphia (PA): AACR; Clin Cancer Res 2023;29(18_Suppl):Abstract nr PO-043.

Fetched live from OpenAlex and de-inverted. Abstracts are not stored in this database: the inverted indexes are 8.6 GB of the frame’s 9.3 GB of text, and the host has 13 GB free.

How this classification was reachedexpand

Full frame machine prediction

Teacher imitation

Not calibrated prevalence, not ground truth. Human validation pending. The Gemma side is a direct model label for every work in the frame, read from the title-only record. The Codex side is a classifier learned from the 10,348 direct Codex labels and calibrated to design-weighted sample rates; fields without enough sample support carry no Codex call. Candidate is the union of the two sides; consensus is their intersection. These outputs are machine_predicted_unvalidated and are not human labels.

metaresearch head score (Codex)0.001
metaresearch head score (Gemma)0.001
Version: metacan-v3-hybrid-931329e0061cValidation status: machine_predicted_unvalidated
Candidate categoriesnone
Consensus categoriesnone
DomainCandidate signal: none · Consensus signal: none
Study designCandidate signal: Simulation or modeling · Consensus signal: Simulation or modeling
GenreCandidate signal: Methods · Consensus signal: none
Teacher disagreement score0.019
Threshold uncertainty score0.038

Distilled classifier scores by category (both heads)

CategoryCodexGemma
Metaresearch0.0010.001
Meta-epidemiology (narrow)0.0010.000
Meta-epidemiology (broad)0.0010.001
Bibliometrics0.0010.000
Science and technology studies0.0000.000
Scholarly communication0.0010.000
Open science0.0010.001
Research integrity0.0010.001
Insufficient payload (model declined to judge)0.0020.000

Machine scores (provisional)

The two teacher heads of the student model, read on this work. A score orders the frame for review; it never asserts a category, and the validation status ships verbatim with every row.

Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed, 7 training rounds). Scores rank; they never assert a category.

Opus teacher head0.135
GPT teacher head0.488
Teacher spread0.353 · how far apart the two teachers sit on this one work
Validation statusscore_only:v0-immature-baseline · verbatim from the scoring run: score_only means the number may rank works, and no category label ships from it

Classification

machine, unvalidated

Machine predicted; a candidate call from one source (direct Gemma or distilled Codex), not a consensus.

The models applied no category: nothing in the taxonomy fit this work.
Study designSimulation or modeling
Domainnot available
GenreMethods

How this classification was reached, model by model and score by score, is at the end of the page under "How this classification was reached".

Quick stats

Citations0
Published2023
Admission routes1
Has abstractyes

Explore more

Same venueClinical Cancer ResearchSame topicRadiomics and Machine Learning in Medical ImagingFrench-language works237,207