MétaCan
Menu
Back to cohort

Abstract PO-095: TGF-β carrying exosomes in plasma of HNSCC as potential biomarkers of disease progression in patients with HNSCC

2023· article· en· W4386784564 on OpenAlexaboutno aff
Nils Ludwig, Saigopalakrishna S. Yerneni, Theresa L. Whiteside

Bibliographic record

VenueClinical Cancer Research · 2023
Typearticle
Languageen
FieldBiochemistry, Genetics and Molecular Biology
TopicExtracellular vesicles in disease
Canadian institutionsnot available
Fundersnot available
KeywordsCancer researchTransforming growth factorFlow cytometryCancerTumor progressionCarcinogenesisMicrovesiclesPlasma cellHead and neck squamous-cell carcinomaBiologyMedicinePathologyHead and neck cancerMolecular biologyAntibodyInternal medicineImmunologymicroRNAGene

Abstract

fetched live from OpenAlex

Abstract Background: The contribution of TGFβ+ exosomes, now referred to as small extracellular vesicles (sEV), in plasma of cancer patients to disease progression has been unclear. Levels of TGFβ in plasma often do not correlate with clinicopathological data, and TGFβ can exert dual (yin-yang) effects as a tumor promoter and a tumor inhibitor. We evaluated the potential of tumor-derived sEV dubbed TEX to serve as liquid tumor biopsy in patients with HNSCC. Methods: Plasma was obtained from 3 different cohorts of patients with HNSCC (n=97) and HDs (n=22). Clinicopathology/demographic data were available for all patients. sEV were isolated by ultrafiltration/size exclusion chromatography (SEC) from plasma or cell supernatants. TGF-β levels in plasma were assessed by ELISA; TGF-β expression in tissues was studied by IHC and immunoblots; immunoblots, flow cytometry and LC-MS/MS were used to measure TGF-β in isolated sEV. TGFB1 gene expression was analyzed using the TCGA Head and Neck Cancer database (n=520 cases and 44 NC). TGF-β signaling and activity of EVs were quantified in the reporter cell (MFB-F11) proliferation assays. Changes of TGF-β expression levels in plasma, tissues and sEV during carcinogenesis were studied in an orthotopic 4NQO mouse model. Results: Using the TCGA we found high expression levels of the vesiculation genes regulating EV production/release and of the TGFB1 gene expression in HNSCC. In the 4NQO orthotopic model of OSCC, cancer progression correlated with TGF-β accumulations in tumor tissues and a significant increase in circulating TGF-β+ sEV. In HNSCC patients, TGF-β levels and activity in plasma and TGF-β expression levels in tumor tissues were significantly elevated relative to controls but did not correlate with clinicopathologic data, tumor burden or disease outcome. TEX produced by HNSCC cell lines carried TGF-β and initiated Smad3 signaling in reporter cells. TGF-β inhibitors blocked this signaling. High TGFβ abundance in sEV was confirmed by proteomics and by RNAseq using the TCGA data base. Levels of TGF-β expression in sEV, sEV numbers and TGF-β activity of sEV were significantly elevated in HNSCC patients vs HDs’ sEV and correlated with tumor stage and LN involvement. Conclusions: TEX and sEV from HNSCC patients’ plasma carry TGF-β which reflects disease progression in HNSCC patients and in a mouse model of oral carcinogenesis. Neither plasma levels of TGF-β (ELISA) nor levels of TGF-β expression in the tumor (IHC) correlated with disease progression. Only sEV-associated TGF-β correlates with tumor burden and shows promise as a non-invasive biomarker of HNSCC progression and response to therapy. Citation Format: Nils Ludwig, Saigopalakrishna S. Yerneni, Theresa L. Whiteside. TGF-β carrying exosomes in plasma of HNSCC as potential biomarkers of disease progression in patients with HNSCC [abstract]. In: Proceedings of the AACR-AHNS Head and Neck Cancer Conference: Innovating through Basic, Clinical, and Translational Research; 2023 Jul 7-8; Montreal, QC, Canada. Philadelphia (PA): AACR; Clin Cancer Res 2023;29(18_Suppl):Abstract nr PO-095.

Fetched live from OpenAlex and de-inverted. Abstracts are not stored in this database: the inverted indexes are 8.6 GB of the frame’s 9.3 GB of text, and the host has 13 GB free.

How this classification was reachedexpand

Full frame machine prediction

Teacher imitation

Not calibrated prevalence, not ground truth. Human validation pending. The Gemma side is a direct model label for every work in the frame, read from the title-only record. The Codex side is a classifier learned from the 10,348 direct Codex labels and calibrated to design-weighted sample rates; fields without enough sample support carry no Codex call. Candidate is the union of the two sides; consensus is their intersection. These outputs are machine_predicted_unvalidated and are not human labels.

metaresearch head score (Codex)0.000
metaresearch head score (Gemma)0.000
Version: metacan-v3-hybrid-931329e0061cValidation status: machine_predicted_unvalidated
Candidate categoriesnone
Consensus categoriesnone
DomainCandidate signal: none · Consensus signal: none
Study designCandidate signal: Observational · Consensus signal: Observational
GenreCandidate signal: Empirical · Consensus signal: Empirical
Teacher disagreement score0.001
Threshold uncertainty score0.004

Distilled classifier scores by category (both heads)

CategoryCodexGemma
Metaresearch0.0000.000
Meta-epidemiology (narrow)0.0000.000
Meta-epidemiology (broad)0.0000.000
Bibliometrics0.0000.000
Science and technology studies0.0000.000
Scholarly communication0.0000.000
Open science0.0000.000
Research integrity0.0000.000
Insufficient payload (model declined to judge)0.0010.000

Machine scores (provisional)

The two teacher heads of the student model, read on this work. A score orders the frame for review; it never asserts a category, and the validation status ships verbatim with every row.

Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed, 7 training rounds). Scores rank; they never assert a category.

Opus teacher head0.054
GPT teacher head0.449
Teacher spread0.395 · how far apart the two teachers sit on this one work
Validation statusscore_only:v0-immature-baseline · verbatim from the scoring run: score_only means the number may rank works, and no category label ships from it

Classification

machine, unvalidated

Machine predicted; a candidate call from one source (direct Gemma or distilled Codex), not a consensus.

The models applied no category: nothing in the taxonomy fit this work.
Study designObservational
Domainnot available
GenreEmpirical

How this classification was reached, model by model and score by score, is at the end of the page under "How this classification was reached".

Quick stats

Citations0
Published2023
Admission routes1
Has abstractyes

Explore more

Same venueClinical Cancer ResearchSame topicExtracellular vesicles in diseaseFrench-language works237,207