MétaCan
Menu
Back to cohort
Record W4386789488 · doi:10.53555/sfs.v10i2s.330

Design of 243 Level Trinary Ladder Multilevel Inverter using VHDL

2023· article· en· W4386789488 on OpenAlexvenueno aff
R. Nithya, T. Anitha, M. Arulaalan

Bibliographic record

VenueJournal of Survey in Fisheries Sciences · 2023
Typearticle
Languageen
FieldEngineering
TopicMultilevel Inverters and Converters
Canadian institutionsnot available
Fundersnot available
KeywordsInverterComputer scienceVHDLPulse-width modulationMATLABTotal harmonic distortionElectronic engineeringControl theory (sociology)Topology (electrical circuits)EngineeringComputer hardwareVoltageField-programmable gate arrayControl (management)Electrical engineeringArtificial intelligence

Abstract

fetched live from OpenAlex

In this paper, a 243 level Trinary Switched Ladder Multi-level Inverter based on a novel non-carrier switching angles algorithm is proposed. The novel switching angle algorithms generate the triggering angles for the Digital Pulse Width Modulation signals. The advantage of the non-carries switching angle algorithm is the precision of the switching signals. The Trinary Switched Ladder Multi-Level Inverter is a topology that utilizes two wings of DC sources with switch controls for the generation of the Multi-Level Inverter levels. The 243–level Trinary Switched Multi-Level Inverter requires 10 switches that split 5 each between the positive wing and negative wing respectively. The 10 switching patterns are developed using the VHDL code to control the proposed switched ladder Inverter. The validation of the proposed method is achieved using the VHDL code cross-compiled in MATLAB SIMULINK. The parameters namely %THD, Vpeak, Vrms are manipulated for the proposed 243-level Trinary Switched Ladder Multi-Level Inverter

Fetched live from OpenAlex and de-inverted. Abstracts are not stored in this database: the inverted indexes are 8.6 GB of the frame’s 9.3 GB of text, and the host has 13 GB free.

How this classification was reachedexpand

Full frame distilled prediction

Teacher imitation

Not calibrated prevalence, not ground truth. Human validation pending. Learned from the 10,348 direct Codex labels and 10,348 direct Gemma labels. Candidate is the union of thresholded teacher heads; consensus is their intersection. These outputs are machine_predicted_unvalidated and are not human labels or direct frontier model labels.

metaresearch head score (Codex)0.002
metaresearch head score (Gemma)0.000
Version: codex-gemma-dda1882f352aValidation status: machine_predicted_unvalidated
Candidate categoriesnone
Consensus categoriesnone
DomainCandidate signal: none · Consensus signal: none
Study designCandidate signal: Observational · Consensus signal: none
GenreCandidate signal: Empirical · Consensus signal: Empirical
Teacher disagreement score0.530
Threshold uncertainty score0.529

Codex and Gemma teacher scores by category

CategoryCodexGemma
Metaresearch0.0020.000
Meta-epidemiology (narrow)0.0000.000
Meta-epidemiology (broad)0.0000.000
Bibliometrics0.0000.001
Science and technology studies0.0000.000
Scholarly communication0.0000.001
Open science0.0000.000
Research integrity0.0000.000
Insufficient payload (model declined to judge)0.0000.000

Machine scores (provisional)

The two teacher heads of the student model, read on this work. A score orders the frame for review; it never asserts a category, and the validation status ships verbatim with every row.

Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed, 7 training rounds). Scores rank; they never assert a category.

Opus teacher head0.499
GPT teacher head0.303
Teacher spread0.196 · how far apart the two teachers sit on this one work
Validation statusscore_only:v0-immature-baseline · verbatim from the scoring run: score_only means the number may rank works, and no category label ships from it

Classification

machine, unvalidated

Machine predicted; a candidate call from one teacher head, not a consensus.

The models applied no category: nothing in the taxonomy fit this work.
Study designObservational
Domainnot available
GenreEmpirical

How this classification was reached, model by model and score by score, is at the end of the page under "How this classification was reached".

Quick stats

Citations3
Published2023
Admission routes1
Has abstractyes

Explore more

Same venueJournal of Survey in Fisheries SciencesSame topicMultilevel Inverters and ConvertersFrench-language works237,207