MétaCan
Menu
Back to cohort
Record W4386800515 · doi:10.23977/aetp.2023.071007

Research on the Training Path of Innovation and Entrepreneurship Ability of Retired Military College Students

2023· article· en· W4386800515 on OpenAlexvenueno aff
Yongxiang Wang, Xueli He

Bibliographic record

VenueAdvances in Educational Technology and Psychology · 2023
Typearticle
Languageen
FieldEngineering
TopicBiomedical and Engineering Education
Canadian institutionsnot available
Fundersnot available
KeywordsEntrepreneurshipMilitary serviceService (business)Training (meteorology)BusinessPublic relationsMarketingMedical educationPsychologyManagementPolitical scienceMedicineEconomicsFinance

Abstract

fetched live from OpenAlex

Ex-servicemen are important human resources and important forces in building socialism with Chinese characteristics. Encourage veterans innovation entrepreneurship, guide them to actively participate in "public entrepreneurship, peoples innovation" practice, to better realize veterans own value, boost economic and social development, service of national defense and army construction is of great significance, explore the path of veterans innovative entrepreneurial ability training, effectively promote veterans innovation entrepreneurship and employment ability training, constantly improve the quality of veterans training. Veterans college students 'innovative entrepreneurial ability training needs education based on personalized and differentiated service, practical needs, establish a perfect system and mechanism, and constantly improve and strengthen innovative entrepreneurial support services, provide strong guarantee for veterans college students' innovative entrepreneurship. This paper analyzes four aspects: constructing the entrepreneurial ability model of the retired military college students, improving the innovation and entrepreneurship ability of demobilized military college students, the Problems faced by veterans in the process of starting businesses and solutions, and the path of improving the entrepreneurial ability of retired military college students.

Fetched live from OpenAlex and de-inverted. Abstracts are not stored in this database: the inverted indexes are 8.6 GB of the frame’s 9.3 GB of text, and the host has 13 GB free.

How this classification was reachedexpand

Full frame distilled prediction

Teacher imitation

Not calibrated prevalence, not ground truth. Human validation pending. Learned from the 10,348 direct Codex labels and 10,348 direct Gemma labels. Candidate is the union of thresholded teacher heads; consensus is their intersection. These outputs are machine_predicted_unvalidated and are not human labels or direct frontier model labels.

metaresearch head score (Codex)0.001
metaresearch head score (Gemma)0.000
Version: codex-gemma-dda1882f352aValidation status: machine_predicted_unvalidated
Candidate categoriesnone
Consensus categoriesnone
DomainCandidate signal: none · Consensus signal: none
Study designCandidate signal: Theoretical or conceptual · Consensus signal: none
GenreCandidate signal: Empirical · Consensus signal: Empirical
Teacher disagreement score0.464
Threshold uncertainty score0.170

Codex and Gemma teacher scores by category

CategoryCodexGemma
Metaresearch0.0010.000
Meta-epidemiology (narrow)0.0000.000
Meta-epidemiology (broad)0.0000.000
Bibliometrics0.0010.002
Science and technology studies0.0000.000
Scholarly communication0.0000.000
Open science0.0000.000
Research integrity0.0000.000
Insufficient payload (model declined to judge)0.0000.000

Machine scores (provisional)

The two teacher heads of the student model, read on this work. A score orders the frame for review; it never asserts a category, and the validation status ships verbatim with every row.

Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed, 7 training rounds). Scores rank; they never assert a category.

Opus teacher head0.053
GPT teacher head0.400
Teacher spread0.347 · how far apart the two teachers sit on this one work
Validation statusscore_only:v0-immature-baseline · verbatim from the scoring run: score_only means the number may rank works, and no category label ships from it

Classification

machine, unvalidated

Machine predicted; a candidate call from one teacher head, not a consensus.

The models applied no category: nothing in the taxonomy fit this work.
Study designTheoretical or conceptual
Domainnot available
GenreEmpirical

How this classification was reached, model by model and score by score, is at the end of the page under "How this classification was reached".

Quick stats

Citations2
Published2023
Admission routes1
Has abstractyes

Explore more

Same venueAdvances in Educational Technology and PsychologySame topicBiomedical and Engineering EducationFrench-language works237,207