Research on the Application of Artificial Intelligence Empowered Education Management
Why this work is in the frame
A frame that forgets how it found something cannot be audited. These are the routes that admitted this work.
Bibliographic record
Abstract
The technological revolution and industrial transformation have driven artificial intelligence to become the core driving force for a new round. This article explores the application scenarios of artificial intelligence in empowering education management and supply, student learning and evaluation, and teacher teaching and development in the field of educational management. This study proposes to promote the construction of new infrastructure for education management, dual empowerment of education and technology, support the reshaping of future education forms through artificial intelligence, strengthen the cultivation of professional talents in artificial intelligence, attach importance to ethical issues in the application of artificial intelligence in education management, stimulate teachers' high-level thinking and initiative, and lead the next generation of educational artificial intelligence innovation, in order to construct the transformation and innovation of artificial intelligence, improve the quality and efficiency of school education management work, and promote high-quality development of education.
Fetched live from OpenAlex and de-inverted. Abstracts are not stored in this database: the inverted indexes are 8.6 GB of the frame’s 9.3 GB of text, and the host has 13 GB free.
Full frame distilled prediction
Teacher imitationNot calibrated prevalence, not ground truth. Human validation pending. Learned from the 10,348 direct Codex labels and 10,348 direct Gemma labels. Candidate is the union of thresholded teacher heads; consensus is their intersection. These outputs are machine_predicted_unvalidated and are not human labels or direct frontier model labels.
Codex and Gemma teacher scores by category
| Category | Codex | Gemma |
|---|---|---|
| Metaresearch | 0.007 | 0.001 |
| Meta-epidemiology (narrow) | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Meta-epidemiology (broad) | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Bibliometrics | 0.001 | 0.004 |
| Science and technology studies | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Scholarly communication | 0.000 | 0.001 |
| Open science | 0.002 | 0.000 |
| Research integrity | 0.000 | 0.001 |
| Insufficient payload (model declined to judge) | 0.000 | 0.001 |
Machine scores (provisional)
The two teacher heads of the student model, read on this work. A score orders the frame for review; it never asserts a category, and the validation status ships verbatim with every row.
Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed, 7 training rounds). Scores rank; they never assert a category.
score_only:v0-immature-baseline · verbatim from the scoring run: score_only means the number may rank works, and no category label ships from it