MétaCan
Menu
← Back to cohort
Record W4386802997 · doi:10.46759/iijsr.2023.7306

A Case Study on Mental Health, Mental Disorder and Epidemiology

2023· article· en· W4386802997 on OpenAlexaboutno aff
Sajid Miya

Bibliographic record

Venuenot available
Typearticle
Languageen
FieldPsychology
TopicMental Health Treatment and Access
Canadian institutionsnot available
Fundersnot available
KeywordsMental healthEpidemiologyPsychiatryPsychologyMedicineInternal medicine

Abstract

fetched live from OpenAlex

Introduction Mental Health and Mental DisorderA vital component of total well health, mental health is intimately related to the physiological and physical functioning of the body.The capacity of an individual to establish harmonious relationships with others and to take part in or positively contribute to changes in the social environment is defined by the WHO expert committee as mental health.While, mental disorders encompass a wide-ranging problem, with diverse symptoms.Yet, they are usually categorized by abnormal thoughts, behavior and emotions. Prevalence of Mental DisordersNeuropsychiatric ailments are projected to contribute 13% of the worldwide burden of disease [WHO, 2011].The main cause of impairment in the US and Canada is mental illness.The incidence of lifestyle illnesses has been rising as a result of sociodemographic changes, the media revolution, and epidemiological change.A consumer-driven lifestyle is gradually taking the place of previous generations' social, biological, and psychological advantages, making individuals of all ages increasingly susceptible to social, mental, and psychological issues.Particularly compared to other nations in the area, countries in prevalence estimates for North and South East Asia were consistently lower.Similar low one-year prevalence rates of common mental illnesses were found in Sub-Saharan African nations, but the highest estimates of lifetime prevalence of common mental disorders were found in English-speaking nations [Steel Z. et al., 2014].Approximately 26.2 percent of USA population suffers from mental disorder in a present year.Even if, mental disorders which are prevalent in the population, nevertheless the core burden of disease is intense in a much minor quantity [Kessler R. C. et al., 2005].

Fetched live from OpenAlex and de-inverted. Abstracts are not stored in this database: the inverted indexes are 8.6 GB of the frame’s 9.3 GB of text, and the host has 13 GB free.

How this classification was reachedexpand

Full frame machine prediction

Teacher imitation

Not calibrated prevalence, not ground truth. Human validation pending. The Gemma side is a direct model label for every work in the frame, read from the title-only record. The Codex side is a classifier learned from the 10,348 direct Codex labels and calibrated to design-weighted sample rates; fields without enough sample support carry no Codex call. Candidate is the union of the two sides; consensus is their intersection. These outputs are machine_predicted_unvalidated and are not human labels.

metaresearch head score (Codex)0.001
metaresearch head score (Gemma)0.002
Version: metacan-v3-hybrid-931329e0061cValidation status: machine_predicted_unvalidated
Candidate categoriesnone
Consensus categoriesnone
DomainCandidate signal: none · Consensus signal: none
Study designCandidate signal: Case report · Consensus signal: Case report
GenreCandidate signal: Empirical · Consensus signal: Empirical
Teacher disagreement score0.013
Threshold uncertainty score0.043

Distilled classifier scores by category (both heads)

CategoryCodexGemma
Metaresearch0.0010.002
Meta-epidemiology (narrow)0.0010.000
Meta-epidemiology (broad)0.0010.001
Bibliometrics0.0030.003
Science and technology studies0.0030.001
Scholarly communication0.0020.002
Open science0.0010.003
Research integrity0.0020.002
Insufficient payload (model declined to judge)0.0130.002

Machine scores (provisional)

The two teacher heads of the student model, read on this work. A score orders the frame for review; it never asserts a category, and the validation status ships verbatim with every row.

Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed, 7 training rounds). Scores rank; they never assert a category.

Opus teacher head0.170
GPT teacher head0.512
Teacher spread0.342 · how far apart the two teachers sit on this one work
Validation statusscore_only:v0-immature-baseline · verbatim from the scoring run: score_only means the number may rank works, and no category label ships from it

Classification

machine, unvalidated

Machine predicted; a candidate call from one source (direct Gemma or distilled Codex), not a consensus.

The models applied no category: nothing in the taxonomy fit this work.
Study designCase report
Domainnot available
GenreEmpirical

How this classification was reached, model by model and score by score, is at the end of the page under "How this classification was reached".

Quick stats

Citations0
Published2023
Admission routes1
Has abstractyes

Explore more

Same topicMental Health Treatment and Access→French-language works237,207→