Analysis of Spatiotemporal Characteristics of Student Concentration Based on Emotion Evolution
Bibliographic record
Abstract
Detecting the concentration of students in the classroom can help teachers quickly understand the participation and activity of students. However, the concentration of students has complex spatiotemporal distribution and evolution laws, which is challenging to identify and quantify. This paper proposes a novel student concentration evaluation method based on emotional evolution and virus transmission, which analyzes the spatiotemporal characteristics of concentration. The research contents are as follows: (1) A visual emotion classification method based on deep learning algorithm is developed to identify and quantify the emotion changes of each student. (2) On the basis of quantification results of emotion, the concentration index model with introducing the theory of virus transmission is established and further used to explore the spread of student concentration in spatiotemporal dimensions. (3) The Wilcoxon rank sum test (RST) is used to verify the difference of the results calculated by concentration index model in different semesters, and the reliability of the model can be reflected by the Pearson correlation coefficient between the centroid of the spatiotemporal distribution of concentration and final exam results. The experiments of 64 offline courses have been carried out in a same class for two semesters, and the results show that the concentration of student in the spatial dimension can be affected by negative and positive emotions from different regions, while in the temporal dimension, the high concentration level will decrease with increase of course time, and the generation speed of this phenomenon will be further exacerbated after coupling the spatial factors.
Fetched live from OpenAlex and de-inverted. Abstracts are not stored in this database: the inverted indexes are 8.6 GB of the frame’s 9.3 GB of text, and the host has 13 GB free.
How this classification was reachedexpand
Full frame machine prediction
Teacher imitationNot calibrated prevalence, not ground truth. Human validation pending. The Gemma side is a direct model label for every work in the frame, read from the title-only record. The Codex side is a classifier learned from the 10,348 direct Codex labels and calibrated to design-weighted sample rates; fields without enough sample support carry no Codex call. Candidate is the union of the two sides; consensus is their intersection. These outputs are machine_predicted_unvalidated and are not human labels.
Distilled classifier scores by category (both heads)
| Category | Codex | Gemma |
|---|---|---|
| Metaresearch | 0.000 | 0.003 |
| Meta-epidemiology (narrow) | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Meta-epidemiology (broad) | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Bibliometrics | 0.001 | 0.001 |
| Science and technology studies | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Scholarly communication | 0.001 | 0.001 |
| Open science | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Research integrity | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Insufficient payload (model declined to judge) | 0.001 | 0.000 |
Machine scores (provisional)
The two teacher heads of the student model, read on this work. A score orders the frame for review; it never asserts a category, and the validation status ships verbatim with every row.
Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed, 7 training rounds). Scores rank; they never assert a category.
score_only:v0-immature-baseline · verbatim from the scoring run: score_only means the number may rank works, and no category label ships from itClassification
machine, unvalidatedMachine predicted; a candidate call from one source (direct Gemma or distilled Codex), not a consensus.
How this classification was reached, model by model and score by score, is at the end of the page under "How this classification was reached".