MétaCan
Menu
Back to cohort
Record W4386803886 · doi:10.61450/joci.v1i6.56

Effect of Faradarmani Consciousness Field on proliferation, telomerase activity, and telomere length of the human mesenchymal stem cells

2022· article· en· W4386803886 on OpenAlexaff
Mohammad Ali Taheri, Laleh Amani, Noushin Nabavi, Ali Zaman Vaziri, Ahmad Khalili

Bibliographic record

VenueThe Scientific Journal of Cosmointel · 2022
Typearticle
Languageen
FieldMedicine
TopicTelomeres, Telomerase, and Senescence
Canadian institutionsUniversity of Victoria
Fundersnot available
KeywordsTelomeraseTelomereMesenchymal stem cellStem cellCell growthBiologyCell divisionRNACell biologyMolecular biologyCellDNACancer researchGeneticsGene

Abstract

fetched live from OpenAlex

Taheri Consciousness (T-Consciousness) was introduced and defined by Mohammad Ali Taheri as one of the constituent components of the Cosmos in addition to matter and energy, from which Taheri Consciousness Fields (TCFs) are derived. TCFs are not matter or energy, but they can be proven by scientific experiments. The effect of Faradarmani CF, as one of TCFs, was examined in this study. Telomerase is an important enzyme, which adds DNA sequence repeats to the ends of chromosomes, thus prevents from their shortening. Telomerase activity is associated with cell proliferation, organism growth, and aging. This study aimed to study proliferation, telomerase activity, and telomere length in the Faradarmani CF treated mesenchymal stem cells (MSCs). Human MSCs were isolated from bone marrow and the morphology, proliferation of cells, length of telomere, and activity of telomerase were evaluated in Faradarmani CF treatment and control groups. The results showed that Faradarmani CF significantly increased the proliferation, length of telomere, and activity of telomerase in hMSCs compared with the control group (p<0.05). Considering the effects of Faradarmani on telomere length and telomerase activity, which are two important factors for cures of several age-related diseases, it is recommended that more experiments be performed in this regard to clarify the effect of TCFs on ageing.

Fetched live from OpenAlex and de-inverted. Abstracts are not stored in this database: the inverted indexes are 8.6 GB of the frame’s 9.3 GB of text, and the host has 13 GB free.

How this classification was reachedexpand

Full frame machine prediction

Teacher imitation

Not calibrated prevalence, not ground truth. Human validation pending. The Gemma side is a direct model label for every work in the frame, read from the title-only record. The Codex side is a classifier learned from the 10,348 direct Codex labels and calibrated to design-weighted sample rates; fields without enough sample support carry no Codex call. Candidate is the union of the two sides; consensus is their intersection. These outputs are machine_predicted_unvalidated and are not human labels.

metaresearch head score (Codex)0.000
metaresearch head score (Gemma)0.000
Version: metacan-v3-hybrid-931329e0061cValidation status: machine_predicted_unvalidated
Candidate categoriesnone
Consensus categoriesnone
DomainCandidate signal: none · Consensus signal: none
Study designCandidate signal: Observational · Consensus signal: none
GenreCandidate signal: Empirical · Consensus signal: Empirical
Teacher disagreement score0.001
Threshold uncertainty score0.005

Distilled classifier scores by category (both heads)

CategoryCodexGemma
Metaresearch0.0000.000
Meta-epidemiology (narrow)0.0000.000
Meta-epidemiology (broad)0.0000.000
Bibliometrics0.0000.000
Science and technology studies0.0000.000
Scholarly communication0.0000.000
Open science0.0000.000
Research integrity0.0000.000
Insufficient payload (model declined to judge)0.0010.000

Machine scores (provisional)

The two teacher heads of the student model, read on this work. A score orders the frame for review; it never asserts a category, and the validation status ships verbatim with every row.

Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed, 7 training rounds). Scores rank; they never assert a category.

Opus teacher head0.013
GPT teacher head0.271
Teacher spread0.258 · how far apart the two teachers sit on this one work
Validation statusscore_only:v0-immature-baseline · verbatim from the scoring run: score_only means the number may rank works, and no category label ships from it

Classification

machine, unvalidated

Machine predicted; a candidate call from one source (direct Gemma or distilled Codex), not a consensus.

The models applied no category: nothing in the taxonomy fit this work.
Study designObservational
Domainnot available
GenreEmpirical

How this classification was reached, model by model and score by score, is at the end of the page under "How this classification was reached".

Quick stats

Citations2
Published2022
Admission routes1
Has abstractyes

Explore more

Same venueThe Scientific Journal of CosmointelSame topicTelomeres, Telomerase, and SenescenceFrench-language works237,207