MétaCan
Menu
Back to cohort
Record W4386803901 · doi:10.61450/joci.v1i7.57

Investigating the effect of Taheri Consciousness Field A on the Behavior of Biomimetic Micellar Supramolecular Models

2022· article· en· W4386803901 on OpenAlex

Why this work is in the frame

A frame that forgets how it found something cannot be audited. These are the routes that admitted this work.

affAt least one author lists a Canadian institution in the pinned OpenAlex snapshot.

Bibliographic record

VenueThe Scientific Journal of Cosmointel · 2022
Typearticle
Languageen
FieldEngineering
TopicMolecular Communication and Nanonetworks
Canadian institutionsUniversity of Victoria
FundersDirectorate for Biological SciencesKharazmi University
KeywordsSupramolecular chemistryChemistryMicelleBiological systemNanotechnologyMoleculeOrganic chemistryBiologyMaterials scienceAqueous solution

Abstract

fetched live from OpenAlex

Supramolecular bio-mimicry models are aggregates of chemical components that have the ability to mimic the function of biological molecules. There are many applications for bio-mimicry models in the industry and other research fields. In basic biology, bio-mimicry models can help investigate vital behaviors and life-beginning forms. The effects of Taheri Consciousness Fields (TCFs) on different levels of life in living systems and non-living components such as metal elements have been studied and confirmed prior to this study. In the present research, we investigated the effect of a TCF on biomimetic models, as chemical structures with biologic-like behaviors, with the aim of understanding how vital behaviors are formed from basic chemical components giving rise to life. In this way, the effect of a type of TCF, named TCF (A), on the structure and function of biomimetic micellar supramolecular models mimicking enzyme behaviors was investigated. To mimic the behavior of heme proteins, such as horseradish peroxidase enzyme, this model contained sodium dodecyl sulphate (SDS) micelles body with histidinate hematin in its core. The results showed that TCF (A) does not change the chemical structure of the built-in biomimetic models. However, the predominant population of the sample model was observed to have a smaller particle size, unlike the untreated control. Additionally, the catalytic activity of the biomimetic sample model had an 8% increase in catalytic efficiency, which resembled the performance of the natural enzyme better than the untreated control. Moreover, zeta potential, conductivity, and mobility of the sample model under the influence of TCF (A) were changed by 40%-45% in comparison with the control. In conclusion, according to the results, the TCF (A) treatment made the micellar supramolecular biomimetic model more stable. It more resembles the structure and function of the colloidal solution with the biological molecules of living organisms.

Fetched live from OpenAlex and de-inverted. Abstracts are not stored in this database: the inverted indexes are 8.6 GB of the frame’s 9.3 GB of text, and the host has 13 GB free.

Full frame distilled prediction

Teacher imitation

Not calibrated prevalence, not ground truth. Human validation pending. Learned from the 10,348 direct Codex labels and 10,348 direct Gemma labels. Candidate is the union of thresholded teacher heads; consensus is their intersection. These outputs are machine_predicted_unvalidated and are not human labels or direct frontier model labels.

metaresearch head score (Codex)0.004
metaresearch head score (Gemma)0.000
Version: codex-gemma-dda1882f352aValidation status: machine_predicted_unvalidated
Candidate categoriesnone
Consensus categoriesnone
DomainCandidate signal: none · Consensus signal: none
Study designCandidate signal: Bench or experimental · Consensus signal: Bench or experimental
GenreCandidate signal: Empirical · Consensus signal: Empirical
Teacher disagreement score0.176
Threshold uncertainty score0.248

Codex and Gemma teacher scores by category

CategoryCodexGemma
Metaresearch0.0040.000
Meta-epidemiology (narrow)0.0000.000
Meta-epidemiology (broad)0.0000.000
Bibliometrics0.0000.001
Science and technology studies0.0000.000
Scholarly communication0.0000.000
Open science0.0010.000
Research integrity0.0000.001
Insufficient payload (model declined to judge)0.0000.000

Machine scores (provisional)

The two teacher heads of the student model, read on this work. A score orders the frame for review; it never asserts a category, and the validation status ships verbatim with every row.

Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed, 7 training rounds). Scores rank; they never assert a category.

Opus teacher head0.015
GPT teacher head0.226
Teacher spread0.211 · how far apart the two teachers sit on this one work
Validation statusscore_only:v0-immature-baseline · verbatim from the scoring run: score_only means the number may rank works, and no category label ships from it