Influence of Faradarmani Consciousness Field (CF) on Spatial Memory and Passive Avoidance Behavior of Scopolamine Model of Alzheimer Disease in Male Wistar Rats
Why this work is in the frame
A frame that forgets how it found something cannot be audited. These are the routes that admitted this work.
Bibliographic record
Abstract
In another study titled “Influence of Faradarmani Consciousness Field (CF) on Spatial Memory and Passive Avoidance Behavior of Scopolamine Model of Alzheimer Disease in Male Wistar Rats,” (Authors: Mohammad Ali Taheri, Sara Torabi, Noushin Nabavi, Farid Semsarha), we evaluated the influence of Faradarmani CF on scopolamine-induced memory impairments in male Wistar rats. The passive avoidance and Morris water maze (MWM) tests were conducted to evaluate memory function in scopolamine-induced rats. The results of passive avoidance and MWM tests showed a significant decrease in spatial memory and cognitive function in scopolamine groups, whereas Faradarmani CF improved scopolamine-induced cognitive impairment. In conclusion, this experiment suggests that Faradarmani CF, as a non-material/non-energetic Field, can be a safe and suitable way to treat or prevent learning and memory disorders. *Corresponding Author: Farid Semsarha Ph.D., Institute of Biochemistry and Biophysics (IBB), University of Tehran, P.O. Box: 13145-1384, Tehran, Iran. Email: Semsarha@alumni.ut.ac.ir. Pending Review.
Fetched live from OpenAlex and de-inverted. Abstracts are not stored in this database: the inverted indexes are 8.6 GB of the frame’s 9.3 GB of text, and the host has 13 GB free.
Full frame distilled prediction
Teacher imitationNot calibrated prevalence, not ground truth. Human validation pending. Learned from the 10,348 direct Codex labels and 10,348 direct Gemma labels. Candidate is the union of thresholded teacher heads; consensus is their intersection. These outputs are machine_predicted_unvalidated and are not human labels or direct frontier model labels.
Codex and Gemma teacher scores by category
| Category | Codex | Gemma |
|---|---|---|
| Metaresearch | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Meta-epidemiology (narrow) | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Meta-epidemiology (broad) | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Bibliometrics | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Science and technology studies | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Scholarly communication | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Open science | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Research integrity | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Insufficient payload (model declined to judge) | 0.000 | 0.000 |
Machine scores (provisional)
The two teacher heads of the student model, read on this work. A score orders the frame for review; it never asserts a category, and the validation status ships verbatim with every row.
Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed, 7 training rounds). Scores rank; they never assert a category.
score_only:v0-immature-baseline · verbatim from the scoring run: score_only means the number may rank works, and no category label ships from it