MétaCan
Menu
Back to cohort
Record W4386804113 · doi:10.23977/acss.2023.070614

The 3D Point Cloud Registration Algorithm Based on Harris-DLFS

2023· article· en· W4386804113 on OpenAlexvenueno aff
Zijian Cong, Zeyuan Liu, Juan Zhu, Chang Xiao, Zongwei Huang

Bibliographic record

VenueAdvances in Computer Signals and Systems · 2023
Typearticle
Languageen
FieldEngineering
Topic3D Shape Modeling and Analysis
Canadian institutionsnot available
FundersDepartment of Science and Technology of Jilin ProvincePeople's Government of Jilin Province
KeywordsPoint cloudRANSACIterative closest pointRobustness (evolution)Computer sciencePoint set registrationImage registrationArtificial intelligenceComputer visionAlgorithmPoint (geometry)MathematicsImage (mathematics)

Abstract

fetched live from OpenAlex

Three-dimensional model reconstruction is a pivotal technology in the realm of computer vision. Point cloud registration serves as its integral step, which decisively impacts the efficiency and precision of the entire reconstruction process. However, existing point cloud registration algorithms often face issues. These include prolonged processing time, inadequate accuracy, and poor robustness. To address these problems, this paper proposes a novel point cloud registration algorithm based on corner detection (Harris) and partition-based local feature statistics (DLFS). The main steps are as follows: Firstly, the Harris corner detection algorithm is employed. This step is crucial for extracting key points and enhancing the efficiency of the registration process. Secondly, the DLFS method is used to describe the features of each key point, generating feature vectors. Subsequently, matching point pairs are filtered based on rigid distance constraints, and an coarse registration is performed using the Random Sample Consensus (RANSAC) algorithm. Finally, the Iterative Closest Point (ICP) algorithm is applied for fine registration. Experimental results demonstrated the effectiveness of this method. It significantly improved registration accuracy, robustness, and computational efficiency. Therefore, it holds substantial value for practical point cloud registration applications.

Fetched live from OpenAlex and de-inverted. Abstracts are not stored in this database: the inverted indexes are 8.6 GB of the frame’s 9.3 GB of text, and the host has 13 GB free.

How this classification was reachedexpand

Full frame distilled prediction

Teacher imitation

Not calibrated prevalence, not ground truth. Human validation pending. Learned from the 10,348 direct Codex labels and 10,348 direct Gemma labels. Candidate is the union of thresholded teacher heads; consensus is their intersection. These outputs are machine_predicted_unvalidated and are not human labels or direct frontier model labels.

metaresearch head score (Codex)0.000
metaresearch head score (Gemma)0.000
Version: codex-gemma-dda1882f352aValidation status: machine_predicted_unvalidated
Candidate categoriesnone
Consensus categoriesnone
DomainCandidate signal: none · Consensus signal: none
Study designCandidate signal: Simulation or modeling · Consensus signal: Simulation or modeling
GenreCandidate signal: Empirical · Consensus signal: none
Teacher disagreement score0.993
Threshold uncertainty score0.320

Codex and Gemma teacher scores by category

CategoryCodexGemma
Metaresearch0.0000.000
Meta-epidemiology (narrow)0.0000.000
Meta-epidemiology (broad)0.0000.000
Bibliometrics0.0000.000
Science and technology studies0.0000.000
Scholarly communication0.0000.000
Open science0.0000.000
Research integrity0.0000.000
Insufficient payload (model declined to judge)0.0000.000

Machine scores (provisional)

The two teacher heads of the student model, read on this work. A score orders the frame for review; it never asserts a category, and the validation status ships verbatim with every row.

Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed, 7 training rounds). Scores rank; they never assert a category.

Opus teacher head0.013
GPT teacher head0.237
Teacher spread0.224 · how far apart the two teachers sit on this one work
Validation statusscore_only:v0-immature-baseline · verbatim from the scoring run: score_only means the number may rank works, and no category label ships from it

Classification

machine, unvalidated

Machine predicted; a candidate call from one teacher head, not a consensus.

The models applied no category: nothing in the taxonomy fit this work.
Study designSimulation or modeling
Domainnot available
GenreEmpirical

How this classification was reached, model by model and score by score, is at the end of the page under "How this classification was reached".

Quick stats

Citations0
Published2023
Admission routes1
Has abstractyes

Explore more

Same venueAdvances in Computer Signals and SystemsSame topic3D Shape Modeling and AnalysisFrench-language works237,207