MétaCan
Menu
Back to cohort
Record W4386806115 · doi:10.4000/criminocorpus.13169

Vivre l’enfermement : Pratiques, expériences et parcours de détention (XVIe-XIXe siècles)

2023· article· fr· W4386806115 on OpenAlexaff
Sophie Abdela

Bibliographic record

VenueCriminocorpus revue hypermédia · 2023
Typearticle
Languagefr
FieldArts and Humanities
TopicHistorical Studies and Socio-cultural Analysis
Canadian institutionsUniversité de Sherbrooke
Fundersnot available
KeywordsSociologyArt

Abstract

fetched live from OpenAlex

« Vivre l’enfermement ». C’est le titre que portaient les journées d’étude qui ont donné lieu à la présente publication. Titre maladroit, certes, mais qui affichait clairement les couleurs de notre initiative de recherche. Il ne s’agissait pas de prétendre qu’une vie ordinaire soit possible en prison, au monastère ou au lazaret. Il ne s’agissait pas non plus de penser un enfermement romantique où les murs, les contraintes, les structures et le pouvoir en général seraient constamment déjoués,...

Fetched live from OpenAlex and de-inverted. Abstracts are not stored in this database: the inverted indexes are 8.6 GB of the frame’s 9.3 GB of text, and the host has 13 GB free.

How this classification was reachedexpand

Full frame machine prediction

Teacher imitation

Not calibrated prevalence, not ground truth. Human validation pending. The Gemma side is a direct model label for every work in the frame, read from the title-only record. The Codex side is a classifier learned from the 10,348 direct Codex labels and calibrated to design-weighted sample rates; fields without enough sample support carry no Codex call. Candidate is the union of the two sides; consensus is their intersection. These outputs are machine_predicted_unvalidated and are not human labels.

metaresearch head score (Codex)0.002
metaresearch head score (Gemma)0.005
Version: metacan-v3-hybrid-931329e0061cValidation status: machine_predicted_unvalidated
Candidate categoriesnone
Consensus categoriesnone
DomainCandidate signal: none · Consensus signal: none
Study designCandidate signal: Qualitative · Consensus signal: Qualitative
GenreCandidate signal: Empirical · Consensus signal: Empirical
Teacher disagreement score0.012
Threshold uncertainty score0.023

Distilled classifier scores by category (both heads)

CategoryCodexGemma
Metaresearch0.0020.005
Meta-epidemiology (narrow)0.0000.000
Meta-epidemiology (broad)0.0000.000
Bibliometrics0.0000.001
Science and technology studies0.0070.010
Scholarly communication0.0060.004
Open science0.0000.004
Research integrity0.0020.004
Insufficient payload (model declined to judge)0.0060.001

Machine scores (provisional)

The two teacher heads of the student model, read on this work. A score orders the frame for review; it never asserts a category, and the validation status ships verbatim with every row.

Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed, 7 training rounds). Scores rank; they never assert a category.

Opus teacher head0.062
GPT teacher head0.288
Teacher spread0.226 · how far apart the two teachers sit on this one work
Validation statusscore_only:v0-immature-baseline · verbatim from the scoring run: score_only means the number may rank works, and no category label ships from it

Classification

machine, unvalidated

Machine predicted; a candidate call from one source (direct Gemma or distilled Codex), not a consensus.

The models applied no category: nothing in the taxonomy fit this work.
Study designQualitative
Domainnot available
GenreEmpirical

How this classification was reached, model by model and score by score, is at the end of the page under "How this classification was reached".

Quick stats

Citations1
Published2023
Admission routes1
Has abstractyes

Explore more

Same venueCriminocorpus revue hypermédiaSame topicHistorical Studies and Socio-cultural AnalysisFrench-language works237,207