MétaCan
Menu
Back to cohort
Record W4386806688 · doi:10.1002/prop.202300121

Noether Gauge Symmetry Approach Applying for the Non‐Minimally Coupled Gravity to the Maxwell Field

2023· article· en· W4386806688 on OpenAlexaff
S. Mahmoudi, S. Hajkhalili, S. H. Hendi

Bibliographic record

VenueFortschritte der Physik · 2023
Typearticle
Languageen
FieldPhysics and Astronomy
TopicBlack Holes and Theoretical Physics
Canadian institutionsCanadian Quantum Research Center
FundersIran Science Elites Federation
KeywordsNoether's theoremPhysicsGauge symmetrySymmetry (geometry)Gauge (firearms)Mathematical physicsClassical mechanicsGauge theoryBlack hole (networking)Theoretical physicsLagrangianMathematicsGeometry

Abstract

fetched live from OpenAlex

Abstract Taking the Noether gauge symmetry approach into account, spherically symmetric static black hole solutions of the non‐minimal gauge‐gravity Lagrangian of the model is found. At first, a system of differential equations for the general non‐minimal couplings of type is considered, and then, it is regarded as a particular non‐minimal model to find the exact black hole solution and analyze its symmetries. As the next step, the thermodynamical quantities of the black hole and its interesting behavior is calculated. Besides, thermal stability and examining the possibility of the van der Waals‐like phase transition is addressed.

Fetched live from OpenAlex and de-inverted. Abstracts are not stored in this database: the inverted indexes are 8.6 GB of the frame’s 9.3 GB of text, and the host has 13 GB free.

How this classification was reachedexpand

Full frame machine prediction

Teacher imitation

Not calibrated prevalence, not ground truth. Human validation pending. The Gemma side is a direct model label for every work in the frame, read from the title-only record. The Codex side is a classifier learned from the 10,348 direct Codex labels and calibrated to design-weighted sample rates; fields without enough sample support carry no Codex call. Candidate is the union of the two sides; consensus is their intersection. These outputs are machine_predicted_unvalidated and are not human labels.

metaresearch head score (Codex)0.001
metaresearch head score (Gemma)0.001
Version: metacan-v3-hybrid-931329e0061cValidation status: machine_predicted_unvalidated
Candidate categoriesnone
Consensus categoriesnone
DomainCandidate signal: none · Consensus signal: none
Study designCandidate signal: Theoretical or conceptual · Consensus signal: Theoretical or conceptual
GenreCandidate signal: Empirical · Consensus signal: none
Teacher disagreement score0.004
Threshold uncertainty score0.014

Distilled classifier scores by category (both heads)

CategoryCodexGemma
Metaresearch0.0010.001
Meta-epidemiology (narrow)0.0010.000
Meta-epidemiology (broad)0.0010.001
Bibliometrics0.0010.000
Science and technology studies0.0010.002
Scholarly communication0.0010.001
Open science0.0010.001
Research integrity0.0010.001
Insufficient payload (model declined to judge)0.0040.000

Machine scores (provisional)

The two teacher heads of the student model, read on this work. A score orders the frame for review; it never asserts a category, and the validation status ships verbatim with every row.

Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed, 7 training rounds). Scores rank; they never assert a category.

Opus teacher head0.013
GPT teacher head0.256
Teacher spread0.243 · how far apart the two teachers sit on this one work
Validation statusscore_only:v0-immature-baseline · verbatim from the scoring run: score_only means the number may rank works, and no category label ships from it

Classification

machine, unvalidated

Machine predicted; a candidate call from one source (direct Gemma or distilled Codex), not a consensus.

The models applied no category: nothing in the taxonomy fit this work.
Study designTheoretical or conceptual
Domainnot available
GenreEmpirical

How this classification was reached, model by model and score by score, is at the end of the page under "How this classification was reached".

Quick stats

Citations0
Published2023
Admission routes1
Has abstractyes

Explore more

Same venueFortschritte der PhysikSame topicBlack Holes and Theoretical PhysicsFrench-language works237,207