Deep Learning Based Optimization Model for Energy Consumption of New Electric Vehicles
Bibliographic record
Abstract
The rapid proliferation and increasing adoption of electric vehicles (EVs) have rendered them a fundamental component of intelligent transportation networks, contributing significantly to the reduction of harmful greenhouse gas emissions.The surge in the number of EVs necessitates an equally expanding infrastructure to meet their charging requirements.Accurate prediction of EV charging demand, therefore, is critical to alleviate strain on power systems and associated costs.This study presents a novel hybrid deep learning model aimed at predicting the charging needs of electric vehicles.The Convolutional Neural Network (CNN), an integral part of this model, is employed for data collection.The CNN effectively extracts local features of the data, focuses on localized information, and reduces computational demands.The Bidirectional Gated Recurrent Unit (BGRU) contributes to superior performance with time-series data due to its inherent ability to analyze such data.The Empirical Mode Decomposition (EMD) is used to decompose the input time series data while preserving their characteristics.The parameters of the BGRU prediction model are then fine-tuned using a hybrid Jarratt-Butterfly optimization algorithm (JBOA) model.The innovative EMD-CNN-BGRU predictor is evaluated using the EV charging dataset collected from the Georgia Institute of Technology in Atlanta, Georgia, USA.The simulation results achieved an impressive 98% accuracy in prediction.A comparative analysis with existing methods in the literature reveals the superior predictive metrics of the proposed deep learning neural forecaster for the dataset under consideration.
Fetched live from OpenAlex and de-inverted. Abstracts are not stored in this database: the inverted indexes are 8.6 GB of the frame’s 9.3 GB of text, and the host has 13 GB free.
How this classification was reachedexpand
Full frame distilled prediction
Teacher imitationNot calibrated prevalence, not ground truth. Human validation pending. Learned from the 10,348 direct Codex labels and 10,348 direct Gemma labels. Candidate is the union of thresholded teacher heads; consensus is their intersection. These outputs are machine_predicted_unvalidated and are not human labels or direct frontier model labels.
Codex and Gemma teacher scores by category
| Category | Codex | Gemma |
|---|---|---|
| Metaresearch | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Meta-epidemiology (narrow) | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Meta-epidemiology (broad) | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Bibliometrics | 0.000 | 0.001 |
| Science and technology studies | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Scholarly communication | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Open science | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Research integrity | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Insufficient payload (model declined to judge) | 0.000 | 0.000 |
Machine scores (provisional)
The two teacher heads of the student model, read on this work. A score orders the frame for review; it never asserts a category, and the validation status ships verbatim with every row.
Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed, 7 training rounds). Scores rank; they never assert a category.
score_only:v0-immature-baseline · verbatim from the scoring run: score_only means the number may rank works, and no category label ships from itClassification
machine, unvalidatedMachine predicted; a candidate call from one teacher head, not a consensus.
How this classification was reached, model by model and score by score, is at the end of the page under "How this classification was reached".