Narratives of Separated Korean Families Overseas in South America: Reconfiguring space-time and meaning as possibilities for existence
Bibliographic record
Abstract
This article addresses the narrative of the separated families in an interpretive framework of meaning. Beginning in the early 1960s, there was a wave of immigration to South America, starting with Brazil and Argentina. Many of these immigrants were separated families with roots in North Korea, and those living abroad are considered compatriots who can be included in both South and North Korea. They turned to the Organization for the Reunification of Separated Korean Families Overseas in Toronto and the Committee on the Protection of Overseas Koreans in in Pyongyang to nd parents and children separated during liberation and the Korean War. The possibility of meeting family members in their hometowns reorganized the meaning of their lives and conrmed their existence in a dierent time and space than they had in the South. It was the family community, the foundation of their identity, that brought their dignity to the universal world. In a world free from a divided society, free from the magnetic eld of ideology, they felt inner freedom and practiced free will toward their homeland, parents and children.
Fetched live from OpenAlex and de-inverted. Abstracts are not stored in this database: the inverted indexes are 8.6 GB of the frame’s 9.3 GB of text, and the host has 13 GB free.
How this classification was reachedexpand
Full frame distilled prediction
Teacher imitationNot calibrated prevalence, not ground truth. Human validation pending. Learned from the 10,348 direct Codex labels and 10,348 direct Gemma labels. Candidate is the union of thresholded teacher heads; consensus is their intersection. These outputs are machine_predicted_unvalidated and are not human labels or direct frontier model labels.
Codex and Gemma teacher scores by category
| Category | Codex | Gemma |
|---|---|---|
| Metaresearch | 0.001 | 0.008 |
| Meta-epidemiology (narrow) | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Meta-epidemiology (broad) | 0.001 | 0.000 |
| Bibliometrics | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Science and technology studies | 0.000 | 0.002 |
| Scholarly communication | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Open science | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Research integrity | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Insufficient payload (model declined to judge) | 0.000 | 0.000 |
Machine scores (provisional)
The two teacher heads of the student model, read on this work. A score orders the frame for review; it never asserts a category, and the validation status ships verbatim with every row.
Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed, 7 training rounds). Scores rank; they never assert a category.
score_only:v0-immature-baseline · verbatim from the scoring run: score_only means the number may rank works, and no category label ships from itClassification
machine, unvalidatedMachine predicted; a candidate call from one teacher head, not a consensus.
How this classification was reached, model by model and score by score, is at the end of the page under "How this classification was reached".