MétaCan
Menu
Back to cohort
Record W4386822802 · doi:10.1080/02255189.2023.2245956

Étude de cas sur le volontourisme : des expériences guatémaltèques chargées de sens

2023· article· fr· W4386822802 on OpenAlexafffundvenue
Caroline Beauchamp, Marc-André Anzueto

Bibliographic record

VenueCanadian Journal of Development Studies/Revue canadienne d études du développement · 2023
Typearticle
Languagefr
FieldSocial Sciences
TopicTourism, Volunteerism, and Development
Canadian institutionsUniversité du Québec en Outaouais
FundersSocial Sciences and Humanities Research Council of Canada
KeywordsHumanitiesSociologyPolitical sciencePhilosophy

Abstract

fetched live from OpenAlex

Cet article examine l’expérience de Guatémaltèques dans des contextes de volontourisme en mobilisant la théorie de l’affect de l’échange social de Lawler. À la suite d’une recherche terrain menée en 2020 auprès de trois organisations, les résultats démontrent que les expériences guatémaltèques ont été généralement positives. Bien que les influences néolibérale et néocoloniale puissent structurer certains aspects des échanges sociaux en volontourisme, la dimension affective des expériences vécues a un impact sur la manière de percevoir l’égalité entre acteurs Nord-Sud. Analyser la dimension affective de l’expérience permet d’identifier d’autres répercussions du volontourisme qui vont au-delà de la dimension politico-économique.

Fetched live from OpenAlex and de-inverted. Abstracts are not stored in this database: the inverted indexes are 8.6 GB of the frame’s 9.3 GB of text, and the host has 13 GB free.

How this classification was reachedexpand

Full frame machine prediction

Teacher imitation

Not calibrated prevalence, not ground truth. Human validation pending. The Gemma side is a direct model label for every work in the frame, read from the title-only record. The Codex side is a classifier learned from the 10,348 direct Codex labels and calibrated to design-weighted sample rates; fields without enough sample support carry no Codex call. Candidate is the union of the two sides; consensus is their intersection. These outputs are machine_predicted_unvalidated and are not human labels.

metaresearch head score (Codex)0.002
metaresearch head score (Gemma)0.004
Version: metacan-v3-hybrid-931329e0061cValidation status: machine_predicted_unvalidated
Candidate categoriesnone
Consensus categoriesnone
DomainCandidate signal: none · Consensus signal: none
Study designCandidate signal: Qualitative · Consensus signal: Qualitative
GenreCandidate signal: Empirical · Consensus signal: Empirical
Teacher disagreement score0.119
Threshold uncertainty score0.236

Distilled classifier scores by category (both heads)

CategoryCodexGemma
Metaresearch0.0020.004
Meta-epidemiology (narrow)0.0000.000
Meta-epidemiology (broad)0.0010.000
Bibliometrics0.0010.002
Science and technology studies0.0140.011
Scholarly communication0.0030.002
Open science0.0010.006
Research integrity0.0010.002
Insufficient payload (model declined to judge)0.0040.000

Machine scores (provisional)

The two teacher heads of the student model, read on this work. A score orders the frame for review; it never asserts a category, and the validation status ships verbatim with every row.

Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed, 7 training rounds). Scores rank; they never assert a category.

Opus teacher head0.066
GPT teacher head0.273
Teacher spread0.207 · how far apart the two teachers sit on this one work
Validation statusscore_only:v0-immature-baseline · verbatim from the scoring run: score_only means the number may rank works, and no category label ships from it

Classification

machine, unvalidated

Machine predicted; a candidate call from one source (direct Gemma or distilled Codex), not a consensus.

The models applied no category: nothing in the taxonomy fit this work.
Study designQualitative
Domainnot available
GenreEmpirical

How this classification was reached, model by model and score by score, is at the end of the page under "How this classification was reached".

Quick stats

Citations1
Published2023
Admission routes3
Has abstractyes

Explore more

Same venueCanadian Journal of Development Studies/Revue canadienne d études du développementSame topicTourism, Volunteerism, and DevelopmentFrench-language works237,207