MétaCan
Menu
Back to cohort
Record W4386822887 · doi:10.1149/1945-7111/acfac2

Adaptation of a PEMFC Reference Electrode to PEMWE: Possibilities and Limitations

2023· article· en· W4386822887 on OpenAlexaff
Lena V. Bühre, Alexander McLeod, Patrick Trinke, Boris Bensmann, Mareike Benecke, Omar E. Herrera, Walter Mérida, Richard Hanke‐Rauschenbach

Bibliographic record

VenueJournal of The Electrochemical Society · 2023
Typearticle
Languageen
FieldEngineering
TopicFuel Cells and Related Materials
Canadian institutionsUniversity of British Columbia
Fundersnot available
KeywordsAnodeCathodeElectrodeProton exchange membrane fuel cellElectrochemistryKinetic energyWork (physics)ElectrolysisStandard electrode potentialElectrical impedanceReference electrodeMaterials scienceCurrent (fluid)MembraneChemistryAnalytical Chemistry (journal)ElectrolyteThermodynamicsElectrical engineeringPhysicsChromatographyPhysical chemistry

Abstract

fetched live from OpenAlex

This work presents a platinum wire micro-reference electrode suitable for recording in-operando individual electrochemical impedance spectra of both the anode and the cathode in a proton exchange membrane water electrolyzer. The setup enables the protonic membrane potential to be accessed outside the active area. The reference electrode allows for the analysis of kinetic parameters for anode and cathode reactions separately. However, the exact location of the measured membrane potential is unknown due to a potentially asymmetric potential distribution, which makes the calculation of exact kinetic parameters non-trivial. Qualitative analyses of the potential distribution behavior over temperature, cell compression, and current density are shown.

Fetched live from OpenAlex and de-inverted. Abstracts are not stored in this database: the inverted indexes are 8.6 GB of the frame’s 9.3 GB of text, and the host has 13 GB free.

How this classification was reachedexpand

Full frame machine prediction

Teacher imitation

Not calibrated prevalence, not ground truth. Human validation pending. The Gemma side is a direct model label for every work in the frame, read from the title-only record. The Codex side is a classifier learned from the 10,348 direct Codex labels and calibrated to design-weighted sample rates; fields without enough sample support carry no Codex call. Candidate is the union of the two sides; consensus is their intersection. These outputs are machine_predicted_unvalidated and are not human labels.

metaresearch head score (Codex)0.007
metaresearch head score (Gemma)0.014
Version: metacan-v3-hybrid-931329e0061cValidation status: machine_predicted_unvalidated
Candidate categoriesnone
Consensus categoriesnone
DomainCandidate signal: none · Consensus signal: none
Study designCandidate signal: Bench or experimental · Consensus signal: Bench or experimental
GenreCandidate signal: Empirical · Consensus signal: none
Teacher disagreement score0.007
Threshold uncertainty score0.040

Distilled classifier scores by category (both heads)

CategoryCodexGemma
Metaresearch0.0070.014
Meta-epidemiology (narrow)0.0010.001
Meta-epidemiology (broad)0.0010.001
Bibliometrics0.0010.001
Science and technology studies0.0000.001
Scholarly communication0.0010.002
Open science0.0060.001
Research integrity0.0020.001
Insufficient payload (model declined to judge)0.0020.002

Machine scores (provisional)

The two teacher heads of the student model, read on this work. A score orders the frame for review; it never asserts a category, and the validation status ships verbatim with every row.

Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed, 7 training rounds). Scores rank; they never assert a category.

Opus teacher head0.020
GPT teacher head0.222
Teacher spread0.202 · how far apart the two teachers sit on this one work
Validation statusscore_only:v0-immature-baseline · verbatim from the scoring run: score_only means the number may rank works, and no category label ships from it

Classification

machine, unvalidated

Machine predicted; a candidate call from one source (direct Gemma or distilled Codex), not a consensus.

The models applied no category: nothing in the taxonomy fit this work.
Study designBench or experimental
Domainnot available
GenreEmpirical

How this classification was reached, model by model and score by score, is at the end of the page under "How this classification was reached".

Quick stats

Citations19
Published2023
Admission routes1
Has abstractyes

Explore more

Same venueJournal of The Electrochemical SocietySame topicFuel Cells and Related MaterialsFrench-language works237,207