MétaCan
Menu
Back to cohort
Record W4386825461 · doi:10.1109/tim.2023.3316705

Synchro-Reassigned Extracting Transform: An Effective Tool for Rotating Machinery Fault Diagnosis Under Varying Speed Condition

2023· article· en· W4386825461 on OpenAlexaff
Hongan Wu, Yong Lv, Rui Yuan, Xingkai Yang, Ke Feng, Weihang Zhu

Bibliographic record

VenueIEEE Transactions on Instrumentation and Measurement · 2023
Typearticle
Languageen
FieldEngineering
TopicMachine Fault Diagnosis Techniques
Canadian institutionsUniversity of Alberta
FundersNatural Science Foundation of Hubei ProvinceNational Natural Science Foundation of China
KeywordsSynchroTime–frequency analysisVibrationFault (geology)Energy (signal processing)Noise (video)Instantaneous phaseComputer scienceBearing (navigation)Signal processingCondition monitoringEngineeringTurbineControl theory (sociology)Electronic engineeringArtificial intelligenceAcousticsComputer visionMathematics

Abstract

fetched live from OpenAlex

Time-frequency analysis techniques offer valuable insights into the dynamic characteristics of non-stationary signals, making them suitable for diagnosing faults in rotating machinery operating under variable speed conditions. However, extracting meaningful features from time-frequency representations (TFRs) faces challenges due to energy spreading caused by complex modes and background noise. To address this issue, this paper introduces a novel technique called the Synchro-Reassigned Extracting Transform (SRET). The SRET uses instantaneous frequency and group delay operators to extract and reassign energy coefficients simultaneously in both the frequency and time directions, enhancing the sharpness of TFRs. Theoretical analysis reveals limitations of the synchroextracting transform (SET) when analyzing signals with both slowly and rapidly varying features, which the proposed SRET effectively overcomes. To optimize computational efficiency, the paper presents a discrete implementation algorithm for SRET. The effectiveness of SRET in analyzing time-varying signals and diagnosing bearing faults is demonstrated through simulations and two sets of bearing vibration data. Additionally, the application of SRET in processing vibration signals from a wind turbine gearbox highlights its potential for fault diagnosis in rotating machinery.

Fetched live from OpenAlex and de-inverted. Abstracts are not stored in this database: the inverted indexes are 8.6 GB of the frame’s 9.3 GB of text, and the host has 13 GB free.

How this classification was reachedexpand

Full frame distilled prediction

Teacher imitation

Not calibrated prevalence, not ground truth. Human validation pending. Learned from the 10,348 direct Codex labels and 10,348 direct Gemma labels. Candidate is the union of thresholded teacher heads; consensus is their intersection. These outputs are machine_predicted_unvalidated and are not human labels or direct frontier model labels.

metaresearch head score (Codex)0.001
metaresearch head score (Gemma)0.000
Version: codex-gemma-dda1882f352aValidation status: machine_predicted_unvalidated
Candidate categoriesMeta-epidemiology (narrow)
Consensus categoriesnone
DomainCandidate signal: none · Consensus signal: none
Study designCandidate signal: Other design · Consensus signal: none
GenreCandidate signal: Empirical · Consensus signal: Empirical
Teacher disagreement score0.749
Threshold uncertainty score1.000

Codex and Gemma teacher scores by category

CategoryCodexGemma
Metaresearch0.0010.000
Meta-epidemiology (narrow)0.0000.000
Meta-epidemiology (broad)0.0000.000
Bibliometrics0.0000.000
Science and technology studies0.0000.000
Scholarly communication0.0000.001
Open science0.0000.000
Research integrity0.0000.000
Insufficient payload (model declined to judge)0.0000.000

Machine scores (provisional)

The two teacher heads of the student model, read on this work. A score orders the frame for review; it never asserts a category, and the validation status ships verbatim with every row.

Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed, 7 training rounds). Scores rank; they never assert a category.

Opus teacher head0.031
GPT teacher head0.309
Teacher spread0.278 · how far apart the two teachers sit on this one work
Validation statusscore_only:v0-immature-baseline · verbatim from the scoring run: score_only means the number may rank works, and no category label ships from it

Classification

machine, unvalidated

Machine predicted; a candidate call from one teacher head, not a consensus.

Study designOther design
Domainnot available
GenreEmpirical

How this classification was reached, model by model and score by score, is at the end of the page under "How this classification was reached".

Quick stats

Citations21
Published2023
Admission routes1
Has abstractyes

Explore more

Same venueIEEE Transactions on Instrumentation and MeasurementSame topicMachine Fault Diagnosis TechniquesFrench-language works237,207