MétaCan
Menu
Back to cohort
Record W4386829003 · doi:10.52209/1609-1825_2023_2_174

10.52209/1609-1825_2023_2_174

2023· article· en· W4386829003 on OpenAlex

Why this work is in the frame

A frame that forgets how it found something cannot be audited. These are the routes that admitted this work.

affAt least one author lists a Canadian institution in the pinned OpenAlex snapshot.

Bibliographic record

VenueTrudy Universiteta · 2023
Typearticle
Languageen
FieldEngineering
TopicTransportation Systems and Logistics
Canadian institutionsCanadian Association of Nurses in Oncology
Fundersnot available
KeywordsMinificationSet (abstract data type)Process (computing)Computer scienceRowMatrix (chemical analysis)Mathematical modelData setBasis (linear algebra)Mathematical optimizationMathematicsArtificial intelligenceStatistics

Abstract

fetched live from OpenAlex

A mathematical model is presented for obtaining data on reduced costs, which can be used in the optimization of machine sets to improve the recruitment process for mechanized detachments during road construction. The mathematical model for calculating the reduced costs, taking into account the probability coefficients for the use of equipment in the set, is built on the basis of a matrix that includes nine columns for types of machines and six rows for the main road construction technologies. By changing the basic input data, the model allows you to automatically recalculate all data. By applying the minimization criterion, it is possible to choose such a set that the total reduced costs for each set of machines and for each technology would be minimal. Optimization of a set of machines of various sizes for mechanized detachments, when designing roads, will reduce the time for building roads and reduce costs.

Fetched live from OpenAlex and de-inverted. Abstracts are not stored in this database: the inverted indexes are 8.6 GB of the frame’s 9.3 GB of text, and the host has 13 GB free.

Full frame distilled prediction

Teacher imitation

Not calibrated prevalence, not ground truth. Human validation pending. Learned from the 10,348 direct Codex labels and 10,348 direct Gemma labels. Candidate is the union of thresholded teacher heads; consensus is their intersection. These outputs are machine_predicted_unvalidated and are not human labels or direct frontier model labels.

metaresearch head score (Codex)0.000
metaresearch head score (Gemma)0.000
Version: codex-gemma-dda1882f352aValidation status: machine_predicted_unvalidated
Candidate categoriesInsufficient payload (model declined to judge)
Consensus categoriesInsufficient payload (model declined to judge)
DomainCandidate signal: none · Consensus signal: none
Study designCandidate signal: Not applicable · Consensus signal: Not applicable
GenreCandidate signal: Empirical · Consensus signal: none
Teacher disagreement score0.511
Threshold uncertainty score0.999

Codex and Gemma teacher scores by category

CategoryCodexGemma
Metaresearch0.0000.000
Meta-epidemiology (narrow)0.0000.000
Meta-epidemiology (broad)0.0000.000
Bibliometrics0.0000.000
Science and technology studies0.0000.000
Scholarly communication0.0000.000
Open science0.0000.000
Research integrity0.0000.000
Insufficient payload (model declined to judge)0.0020.005

Machine scores (provisional)

The two teacher heads of the student model, read on this work. A score orders the frame for review; it never asserts a category, and the validation status ships verbatim with every row.

Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed, 7 training rounds). Scores rank; they never assert a category.

Opus teacher head0.015
GPT teacher head0.177
Teacher spread0.162 · how far apart the two teachers sit on this one work
Validation statusscore_only:v0-immature-baseline · verbatim from the scoring run: score_only means the number may rank works, and no category label ships from it