MétaCan
Menu
Back to cohort
Record W4386832530 · doi:10.1590/2236-463334ep00123

A INDEPENDÊNCIA DO BRASIL NA BAHIA E OS HERÓIS POPULARES DO DOIS DE JULHO

2023· article· pt· W4386832530 on OpenAlexaff
Hendrik Kraay

Bibliographic record

VenueAlmanack · 2023
Typearticle
Languagept
FieldEnvironmental Science
TopicRural Development and Agriculture
Canadian institutionsUniversity of Calgary
Fundersnot available
KeywordsArtHumanitiesPhysics

Abstract

fetched live from OpenAlex

Com a presença do Presidente da República, Luís Inácio Lula da Silva, os duzentos anos da expulsão das tropas portuguesas da capital da Bahia foram festejados com grande entusiasmo em Salvador.Amplamente divulgada pela mídia nacional, a festa do Dois de Julho comemorou, segundo o presidente, "a principal etapa da independência brasileira"."Dom Pedro I gritou independência ou morte, mas quem lutou e morreu foi o povo baiano para conseguir a independência", acrescentou o presidente 3 , repetindo assim o discurso multissecular baiano que destaca a centralidade daquela guerra para a conquista da Independência e a visão do processo que dá relevo à participação popular.Em 1903, o Diário da Bahia declarou, na linguagem florida característica da época, que "DOIS DE JU-LHO é o batismo de sangue da obra do Ipiranga: o 7 de setembro seria uma página quiçá de adesões, se a não tivesse iluminado, perpetuando--a, a coragem gigantesca, a bravura sem par, o patriotismo sem jaça dos heróis da Cachoeira, Pirajá e Cabrito" 4 .Décadas antes, um periódico mais

Fetched live from OpenAlex and de-inverted. Abstracts are not stored in this database: the inverted indexes are 8.6 GB of the frame’s 9.3 GB of text, and the host has 13 GB free.

How this classification was reachedexpand

Full frame machine prediction

Teacher imitation

Not calibrated prevalence, not ground truth. Human validation pending. The Gemma side is a direct model label for every work in the frame, read from the title-only record. The Codex side is a classifier learned from the 10,348 direct Codex labels and calibrated to design-weighted sample rates; fields without enough sample support carry no Codex call. Candidate is the union of the two sides; consensus is their intersection. These outputs are machine_predicted_unvalidated and are not human labels.

metaresearch head score (Codex)0.001
metaresearch head score (Gemma)0.002
Version: metacan-v3-hybrid-931329e0061cValidation status: machine_predicted_unvalidated
Candidate categoriesnone
Consensus categoriesnone
DomainCandidate signal: none · Consensus signal: none
Study designCandidate signal: Not applicable · Consensus signal: none
GenreCandidate signal: Other · Consensus signal: none
Teacher disagreement score0.277
Threshold uncertainty score0.550

Distilled classifier scores by category (both heads)

CategoryCodexGemma
Metaresearch0.0010.002
Meta-epidemiology (narrow)0.0000.000
Meta-epidemiology (broad)0.0000.000
Bibliometrics0.0010.002
Science and technology studies0.0050.003
Scholarly communication0.0020.001
Open science0.0000.002
Research integrity0.0010.002
Insufficient payload (model declined to judge)0.0070.000

Machine scores (provisional)

The two teacher heads of the student model, read on this work. A score orders the frame for review; it never asserts a category, and the validation status ships verbatim with every row.

Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed, 7 training rounds). Scores rank; they never assert a category.

Opus teacher head0.011
GPT teacher head0.229
Teacher spread0.218 · how far apart the two teachers sit on this one work
Validation statusscore_only:v0-immature-baseline · verbatim from the scoring run: score_only means the number may rank works, and no category label ships from it

Classification

machine, unvalidated

Machine predicted; a candidate call from one source (direct Gemma or distilled Codex), not a consensus.

The models applied no category: nothing in the taxonomy fit this work.
Study designNot applicable
Domainnot available
GenreOther

How this classification was reached, model by model and score by score, is at the end of the page under "How this classification was reached".

Quick stats

Citations0
Published2023
Admission routes1
Has abstractno

Explore more

Same venueAlmanackSame topicRural Development and AgricultureFrench-language works237,207