MétaCan
Menu
Back to cohort
Record W4386834176 · doi:10.18280/ria.370407

A Deep Learning Framework for Hand Gesture Recognition and Multimodal Interface Control

2023· article· en· W4386834176 on OpenAlex
Issam Elmagrouni, Abdelaziz Ettaoufik, Siham Aouad, Abderrahim Maizate

Why this work is in the frame

A frame that forgets how it found something cannot be audited. These are the routes that admitted this work.

venuePublished in a venue whose home country is Canada.
no affNo Canadian affiliation: this work is invisible to an affiliation-only frame.
No Canadian affiliation. An affiliation-only frame, the usual design, would never have seen this work. It is one of the works that make the case for inverting the frame.

Bibliographic record

VenueRevue d intelligence artificielle · 2023
Typearticle
Languageen
FieldComputer Science
TopicHand Gesture Recognition Systems
Canadian institutionsnot available
Fundersnot available
KeywordsGestureComputer scienceGesture recognitionInterface (matter)Human–computer interactionDeep learningArtificial intelligenceOperating system

Abstract

fetched live from OpenAlex

Hand gesture recognition (HGR) is an essential technology with applications spanning human-computer interaction, robotics, augmented reality, and virtual reality.This technology enables more natural and effortless interaction with computers, resulting in an enhanced user experience.As HGR adoption increases, it plays a crucial role in bridging the gap between humans and technology, facilitating seamless communication and interaction.In this study, a novel deep learning approach is proposed for the development of a Hand Gesture Interface (HGI) that enables the control of graphical user interfaces without physical touch on personal computers.The methodology encompasses the analysis, design, implementation, and deployment of the HGI.Experimental results on a hand gesture recognition system indicate that the proposed approach improves accuracy and reduces response time compared to existing methods.The system is capable of controlling various multimedia applications, including VLC media player, Microsoft Word, and PowerPoint.In conclusion, this approach offers a promising solution for the development of HGIs that facilitate efficient and intuitive interactions with computers, making communication more natural and accessible for users.

Fetched live from OpenAlex and de-inverted. Abstracts are not stored in this database: the inverted indexes are 8.6 GB of the frame’s 9.3 GB of text, and the host has 13 GB free.

Full frame distilled prediction

Teacher imitation

Not calibrated prevalence, not ground truth. Human validation pending. Learned from the 10,348 direct Codex labels and 10,348 direct Gemma labels. Candidate is the union of thresholded teacher heads; consensus is their intersection. These outputs are machine_predicted_unvalidated and are not human labels or direct frontier model labels.

metaresearch head score (Codex)0.001
metaresearch head score (Gemma)0.001
Version: codex-gemma-dda1882f352aValidation status: machine_predicted_unvalidated
Candidate categoriesInsufficient payload (model declined to judge)
Consensus categoriesnone
DomainCandidate signal: none · Consensus signal: none
Study designCandidate signal: Simulation or modeling · Consensus signal: none
GenreCandidate signal: Empirical · Consensus signal: none
Teacher disagreement score0.960
Threshold uncertainty score1.000

Codex and Gemma teacher scores by category

CategoryCodexGemma
Metaresearch0.0010.001
Meta-epidemiology (narrow)0.0000.000
Meta-epidemiology (broad)0.0000.000
Bibliometrics0.0000.001
Science and technology studies0.0000.000
Scholarly communication0.0000.000
Open science0.0000.000
Research integrity0.0000.000
Insufficient payload (model declined to judge)0.0000.001

Machine scores (provisional)

The two teacher heads of the student model, read on this work. A score orders the frame for review; it never asserts a category, and the validation status ships verbatim with every row.

Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed, 7 training rounds). Scores rank; they never assert a category.

Opus teacher head0.048
GPT teacher head0.293
Teacher spread0.245 · how far apart the two teachers sit on this one work
Validation statusscore_only:v0-immature-baseline · verbatim from the scoring run: score_only means the number may rank works, and no category label ships from it