MétaCan
Menu
Back to cohort
Record W4386837140 · doi:10.3390/muscles2030023

Degradative Signaling in ATG7-Deficient Skeletal Muscle Following Cardiotoxin Injury

2023· article· en· W4386837140 on OpenAlexafffund
Fasih A. Rahman, Troy Campbell, Darin Bloemberg, Sarah E. Chapman, Joe Quadrilatero

Bibliographic record

VenueMuscles · 2023
Typearticle
Languageen
FieldBiochemistry, Genetics and Molecular Biology
TopicMuscle Physiology and Disorders
Canadian institutionsUniversity of Waterloo
FundersNatural Sciences and Engineering Research Council of Canada
KeywordsCardiotoxinSkeletal muscleCell biologyChemistryAnatomyBiology

Abstract

fetched live from OpenAlex

Skeletal muscle is a complex tissue comprising multinucleated and post-mitotic cells (i.e., myofibers). Given this, skeletal muscle must maintain a fine balance between growth and degradative signals. A major system regulating the remodeling of skeletal muscle is autophagy, where cellular quality control is mediated by the degradation of damaged cellular components. The accumulation of damaged cellular material can result in elevated apoptotic signaling, which is particularly relevant in skeletal muscle given its post-mitotic nature. Luckily, skeletal muscle possesses the unique ability to regenerate in response to injury. It is unknown whether a relationship between autophagy and apoptotic signaling exists in injured skeletal muscle and how autophagy deficiency influences myofiber apoptosis and regeneration. In the present study, we demonstrate that an initial inducible muscle-specific autophagy deficiency does not alter apoptotic signaling following cardiotoxin injury. This finding is presumably due to the re-establishment of ATG7 levels following injury, which may be attributed to the contribution of a functional Atg7 gene from satellite cells. Furthermore, the re-expression of ATG7 resulted in virtually identical regenerative potential. Overall, our data demonstrate that catastrophic injury may “reset” muscle gene expression via the incorporation of nuclei from satellite cells.

Fetched live from OpenAlex and de-inverted. Abstracts are not stored in this database: the inverted indexes are 8.6 GB of the frame’s 9.3 GB of text, and the host has 13 GB free.

How this classification was reachedexpand

Full frame distilled prediction

Teacher imitation

Not calibrated prevalence, not ground truth. Human validation pending. Learned from the 10,348 direct Codex labels and 10,348 direct Gemma labels. Candidate is the union of thresholded teacher heads; consensus is their intersection. These outputs are machine_predicted_unvalidated and are not human labels or direct frontier model labels.

metaresearch head score (Codex)0.000
metaresearch head score (Gemma)0.000
Version: codex-gemma-dda1882f352aValidation status: machine_predicted_unvalidated
Candidate categoriesnone
Consensus categoriesnone
DomainCandidate signal: none · Consensus signal: none
Study designCandidate signal: Bench or experimental · Consensus signal: none
GenreCandidate signal: Empirical · Consensus signal: Empirical
Teacher disagreement score0.620
Threshold uncertainty score0.660

Codex and Gemma teacher scores by category

CategoryCodexGemma
Metaresearch0.0000.000
Meta-epidemiology (narrow)0.0000.000
Meta-epidemiology (broad)0.0000.000
Bibliometrics0.0000.000
Science and technology studies0.0000.000
Scholarly communication0.0000.000
Open science0.0000.000
Research integrity0.0000.000
Insufficient payload (model declined to judge)0.0000.000

Machine scores (provisional)

The two teacher heads of the student model, read on this work. A score orders the frame for review; it never asserts a category, and the validation status ships verbatim with every row.

Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed, 7 training rounds). Scores rank; they never assert a category.

Opus teacher head0.013
GPT teacher head0.267
Teacher spread0.254 · how far apart the two teachers sit on this one work
Validation statusscore_only:v0-immature-baseline · verbatim from the scoring run: score_only means the number may rank works, and no category label ships from it

Classification

machine, unvalidated

Machine predicted; a candidate call from one teacher head, not a consensus.

The models applied no category: nothing in the taxonomy fit this work.
Study designBench or experimental
Domainnot available
GenreEmpirical

How this classification was reached, model by model and score by score, is at the end of the page under "How this classification was reached".

Quick stats

Citations6
Published2023
Admission routes2
Has abstractyes

Explore more

Same venueMusclesSame topicMuscle Physiology and DisordersFrench-language works237,207