Points de vue d’hommes victimes d’abus sexuels durant leur enfance sur leur expérience : les retombées de l’aide mutuelle dans l’intervention de groupe
Bibliographic record
Abstract
Cette recherche donne la parole à des hommes ayant été victimes d’abus sexuels pendant leur enfance ou leur adolescence au sujet de leur participation à un groupe axé sur l’aide mutuelle. L’objectif est de documenter l’appréciation des hommes au sujet de cette forme d’aide. Leurs récits témoignent du caractère crucial des relations tissées entre les membres de leur groupe et du soutien mutuel donné et reçu ainsi que des nombreuses retombées positives dans plusieurs dimensions de leur vie. Ce modèle s’avère prometteur dans les services destinés aux hommes victimes d’agression sexuelle durant leur enfance. Ces résultats soulignent l’importance de se fonder sur les besoins de chaque membre, la prise de parole, l’utilisation de l’aide mutuelle, la valorisation des forces, la co-construction d’un processus de groupe garant de changements.
Fetched live from OpenAlex and de-inverted. Abstracts are not stored in this database: the inverted indexes are 8.6 GB of the frame’s 9.3 GB of text, and the host has 13 GB free.
How this classification was reachedexpand
Full frame machine prediction
Teacher imitationNot calibrated prevalence, not ground truth. Human validation pending. The Gemma side is a direct model label for every work in the frame, read from the title-only record. The Codex side is a classifier learned from the 10,348 direct Codex labels and calibrated to design-weighted sample rates; fields without enough sample support carry no Codex call. Candidate is the union of the two sides; consensus is their intersection. These outputs are machine_predicted_unvalidated and are not human labels.
Distilled classifier scores by category (both heads)
| Category | Codex | Gemma |
|---|---|---|
| Metaresearch | 0.003 | 0.009 |
| Meta-epidemiology (narrow) | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Meta-epidemiology (broad) | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Bibliometrics | 0.001 | 0.001 |
| Science and technology studies | 0.004 | 0.003 |
| Scholarly communication | 0.003 | 0.002 |
| Open science | 0.001 | 0.003 |
| Research integrity | 0.001 | 0.002 |
| Insufficient payload (model declined to judge) | 0.007 | 0.000 |
Machine scores (provisional)
The two teacher heads of the student model, read on this work. A score orders the frame for review; it never asserts a category, and the validation status ships verbatim with every row.
Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed, 7 training rounds). Scores rank; they never assert a category.
score_only:v0-immature-baseline · verbatim from the scoring run: score_only means the number may rank works, and no category label ships from itClassification
machine, unvalidatedMachine predicted; a candidate call from one source (direct Gemma or distilled Codex), not a consensus.
How this classification was reached, model by model and score by score, is at the end of the page under "How this classification was reached".