MétaCan
Menu
Back to cohort
Record W4386846577 · doi:10.23977/aetp.2023.071202

Exploration of Teaching Reform Path Based on OBE Concept—Taking Online Marketing Course as an Example

2023· article· en· W4386846577 on OpenAlexvenueno aff
Xiao Ling, Xujie An, Lixing Zhu

Bibliographic record

VenueAdvances in Educational Technology and Psychology · 2023
Typearticle
Languageen
FieldSocial Sciences
TopicInnovative Educational Techniques
Canadian institutionsnot available
Fundersnot available
KeywordsCurriculumTeaching methodPath (computing)Mathematics educationKey (lock)Computer scienceCourse (navigation)PsychologyPedagogyEngineering

Abstract

fetched live from OpenAlex

This paper, taking the course of "Network Marketing" as an example, explores the teaching reform path based on the OBE (Outcome-Based Education) concept. Firstly, it analyzes the core content and characteristics of the OBE concept, pointing out that it focuses on cultivating students' comprehensive qualities and abilities, and pays attention to their actual needs and future development. Then, from the aspects of teaching content, teaching methods, evaluation methods, etc., it proposes the teaching reform path based on the OBE concept, including: 1) Optimizing the curriculum design and clarifying the teaching objectives; 2) Using diversified teaching methods to improve students' learning interest and initiative; 3) Implementing project-based teaching to cultivate students' practical ability and innovative spirit; 4) Establishing a diversified evaluation system to focus on students' all-round development. Finally, it summarizes the teaching reform based on the OBE concept, emphasizes the key role of teachers in the reform, and puts forward further research directions.

Fetched live from OpenAlex and de-inverted. Abstracts are not stored in this database: the inverted indexes are 8.6 GB of the frame’s 9.3 GB of text, and the host has 13 GB free.

How this classification was reachedexpand

Full frame machine prediction

Teacher imitation

Not calibrated prevalence, not ground truth. Human validation pending. The Gemma side is a direct model label for every work in the frame, read from the title-only record. The Codex side is a classifier learned from the 10,348 direct Codex labels and calibrated to design-weighted sample rates; fields without enough sample support carry no Codex call. Candidate is the union of the two sides; consensus is their intersection. These outputs are machine_predicted_unvalidated and are not human labels.

metaresearch head score (Codex)0.003
metaresearch head score (Gemma)0.003
Version: metacan-v3-hybrid-931329e0061cValidation status: machine_predicted_unvalidated
Candidate categoriesnone
Consensus categoriesnone
DomainCandidate signal: none · Consensus signal: none
Study designCandidate signal: Not applicable · Consensus signal: none
GenreCandidate signal: Empirical · Consensus signal: none
Teacher disagreement score0.005
Threshold uncertainty score0.021

Distilled classifier scores by category (both heads)

CategoryCodexGemma
Metaresearch0.0030.003
Meta-epidemiology (narrow)0.0000.000
Meta-epidemiology (broad)0.0000.000
Bibliometrics0.0010.001
Science and technology studies0.0020.002
Scholarly communication0.0020.003
Open science0.0010.002
Research integrity0.0010.002
Insufficient payload (model declined to judge)0.0050.001

Machine scores (provisional)

The two teacher heads of the student model, read on this work. A score orders the frame for review; it never asserts a category, and the validation status ships verbatim with every row.

Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed, 7 training rounds). Scores rank; they never assert a category.

Opus teacher head0.071
GPT teacher head0.475
Teacher spread0.404 · how far apart the two teachers sit on this one work
Validation statusscore_only:v0-immature-baseline · verbatim from the scoring run: score_only means the number may rank works, and no category label ships from it

Classification

machine, unvalidated

Machine predicted; a candidate call from one source (direct Gemma or distilled Codex), not a consensus.

The models applied no category: nothing in the taxonomy fit this work.
Study designNot applicable
Domainnot available
GenreEmpirical

How this classification was reached, model by model and score by score, is at the end of the page under "How this classification was reached".

Quick stats

Citations0
Published2023
Admission routes1
Has abstractyes

Explore more

Same venueAdvances in Educational Technology and PsychologySame topicInnovative Educational TechniquesFrench-language works237,207