MétaCan
Menu
Back to cohort
Record W4386848416 · doi:10.4000/books.irhis.2687

Le retentissement de Brumaire en images : rupture ou continuité ?

2001· book-chapter· fr· W4386848416 on OpenAlexaff
Stéphane Roy

Bibliographic record

VenuePublications de l’Institut de recherches historiques du Septentrion eBooks · 2001
Typebook-chapter
Languagefr
FieldArts and Humanities
TopicHistorical Studies and Socio-cultural Analysis
Canadian institutionsUniversité du Québec à Montréal
Fundersnot available
KeywordsHumanitiesMedicinePhilosophy

Abstract

fetched live from OpenAlex

Si les images réagissent le plus souvent, elles ne deviennent véritablement impertinentes et profondément polysémiques que lorsqu’elles anticipent. Elles s’exprimeront autour du 18 Brumaire sur le premier modèle, adoptant un profil bas, entre louange forcée et réserve circonspecte. En revanche, elles avaient clairement établie, dès 1795-96, la marche du régime vers la dictature militaire, réagissant alors par anticipation. Le retentissement de Brumaire dans les images affirme-t-il donc, comme le propose de l’analyser Stéphane Roy, un éclat marquant la rupture ou la continuité ?

Fetched live from OpenAlex and de-inverted. Abstracts are not stored in this database: the inverted indexes are 8.6 GB of the frame’s 9.3 GB of text, and the host has 13 GB free.

How this classification was reachedexpand

Full frame distilled prediction

Teacher imitation

Not calibrated prevalence, not ground truth. Human validation pending. Learned from the 10,348 direct Codex labels and 10,348 direct Gemma labels. Candidate is the union of thresholded teacher heads; consensus is their intersection. These outputs are machine_predicted_unvalidated and are not human labels or direct frontier model labels.

metaresearch head score (Codex)0.002
metaresearch head score (Gemma)0.001
Version: codex-gemma-dda1882f352aValidation status: machine_predicted_unvalidated
Candidate categoriesMeta-epidemiology (narrow), Science and technology studies, Research integrity, Insufficient payload (model declined to judge)
Consensus categoriesnone
DomainCandidate signal: none · Consensus signal: none
Study designCandidate signal: Not applicable · Consensus signal: none
GenreCandidate signal: Other · Consensus signal: Other
Teacher disagreement score0.885
Threshold uncertainty score1.000

Codex and Gemma teacher scores by category

CategoryCodexGemma
Metaresearch0.0020.001
Meta-epidemiology (narrow)0.0010.001
Meta-epidemiology (broad)0.0010.001
Bibliometrics0.0000.000
Science and technology studies0.0070.001
Scholarly communication0.0010.000
Open science0.0010.000
Research integrity0.0020.002
Insufficient payload (model declined to judge)0.0010.000

Machine scores (provisional)

The two teacher heads of the student model, read on this work. A score orders the frame for review; it never asserts a category, and the validation status ships verbatim with every row.

Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed, 7 training rounds). Scores rank; they never assert a category.

Opus teacher head0.050
GPT teacher head0.256
Teacher spread0.206 · how far apart the two teachers sit on this one work
Validation statusscore_only:v0-immature-baseline · verbatim from the scoring run: score_only means the number may rank works, and no category label ships from it

Classification

machine, unvalidated

Machine predicted; a candidate call from one teacher head, not a consensus.

Study designNot applicable
Domainnot available
GenreOther

How this classification was reached, model by model and score by score, is at the end of the page under "How this classification was reached".

Quick stats

Citations0
Published2001
Admission routes1
Has abstractyes

Explore more

Same venuePublications de l’Institut de recherches historiques du Septentrion eBooksSame topicHistorical Studies and Socio-cultural AnalysisFrench-language works237,207