MétaCan
Menu
Back to cohort
Record W4386854223 · doi:10.1149/ma2023-01151411mtgabs

Progress on Hybrids and Mixed Alloys of Boron Subphthalocyanines (BsubPc) and Boron Subnaphthalocyanines (BsubNc); Tuning the Electrochemical Properties Towards Organic Electronic Applications

2023· article· en· W4386854223 on OpenAlexaff
Timothy P. Bender, Nina F. Farac, Esmeralda Bukuroshi

Bibliographic record

VenueECS Meeting Abstracts · 2023
Typearticle
Languageen
FieldMaterials Science
TopicPorphyrin and Phthalocyanine Chemistry
Canadian institutionsUniversity of Toronto
Fundersnot available
KeywordsOLEDOrganic electronicsConjugated systemOrganic solar cellBoronMaterials scienceElectrochemistryNanotechnologyChemistryOrganic chemistryPolymerPhysical chemistryElectrodeTransistorPhysics

Abstract

fetched live from OpenAlex

Our research and development focus has been on the molecular design, synthetic methodology and in-depth characterization of boron subphthalocyanines (BsubPcs) and subnaphthalocyanines (BsubNcs) to apply them to organic electronic applications. BsubPcs, BsubNcs and their hybrids are macrocycles with a chelated central boron atom via nitrogen bonding, and is a p-conjugated macrocyclic material. Our focal point balances between the basic and applied chemistry, chemical engineering, their in-depth physical properties (electrochemistry included). We also do computational modelling. Once materials are developed, we merge them into organic electronics to function as light emitting, light absorbing and electronic conducting materials within organic light emitting diodes (OLEDs) and organic photovoltaics (OPVs)/organic solar cells (OSCs). The basic electrochemical and photophysical properties, developing and evaluating the properties is critical to move onto such applications. For this presentation, I will focus on our progress on the development of hybrids and mixed alloys of BsubPcs and BsubNcs. Regarding hybrids, they are a mixture of BsubPcs and BsubNcs, and are formed via a reaction of a statistical distribution of phthalonitrile and 2,3-dicyanonaphthalene intermediates on reaction with BCl3; we have named them X-RnBsub(Pcx-Ncy); X the axial substituent, Rn the number of peripheral substitutions, Pcx being the number of 6 p-conjugated bonds, Ncy being the number of 10 p-conjugated bonds (Figure). On first study, we found that X-RnBsub(Pc1-Nc2) have low photostability. Therefore, we moved onto developing a ‘statistical’ synthetic methodology to target highest yields of X-RnBsub(Pc2-Nc1)s, and we did achieve relatively high yields. X-RnBsub(Pc2-Nc1)s therefore could be purified to enable physical characterization. Within a couple past publications, the unique absorption spectra was noted and we have confirmed its uniqueness. The X-RnBsub(Pc2-Nc1)s absorption spectra is as wide as if BsubPc and BsubNc were mixed together. This therefore has good potential to harvest a larger scope of photons from solar or to achieved FRET transfer from a host to emit via an OLED. We then did in-depth first electrochemical characterization, confirmed their electrochemical oxidation and reduction stability and also did in-depth photoluminescence characterization. Therefore, merging X-RnBsub(Pc2-Nc1)s into organic electronic devices as well as other chemistry to synthesis the hybrids is ongoing. Regarding mixed alloys, in the past as we have shown that BsubNcs ended up being a mixed alloyed composition with random bay-position halogenation, that is formed during the reaction of BCl3 with 2,3-dicyanonaphthalene at temperature, which is the process to form the BsubNcs. The random bay-position halogenation has been shown to be impactful in a positive way within OPV devices, negative within OLED devices and also has electrochemical variations and good reversibility. Ongoing, given it is random halogenation, and some of the positive outcomes, this justifies considering additional mixed alloyed compositions. We have also recently shown that mixed alloyed BsubPcs can be formed with three peripheral halogens in the alpha (a) or beta (b) positions, named as Cl-αCl3BsubPc, Cl-βCl3BsubPc, Cl-αF3BsubPc, and Cl-βF3BsubPc. The alloyed mixtures consisted of C1 and C3 isomers of trihalogenated BsubPcs. The physical properties characterization including photophysics, electrochemistry, and thermal characterization, were studied and were also positive and then were engineered into OSCs as electron donors and electrons acceptors to clarify their impact on device performance which had positivity aspects. Therefore, we moved onto developing a set of additional BsubPc mixtures. To be outlined for this presentation, we considered sets of phthalonitrile mixtures to form peripherally halogenated BsubPc mixtures during the formation of BsubPcs from these intermediates. For example, 4,5-dichlorophthalonitrile (Cl2-pn), 4,5-difluorophthalonitrile (F2-pn), tetrachlorophthalonitrile (Cl4-pn), and tetrafluorophthalonitrile (F4-pn) are commercially available compounds that were mixed together and yields a mixture of BsubPc which we named: X-Cl2nF2mBsubPc and X-Cl4nF4mBsubPc (X = Cl or F being a variant, Figure). We then did physical characterization and found positive aspects including electrochemical oxidation and reduction stability. Merging them into organic electronic devices is ongoing and might be present during this presentation time. We did also recently develop additional chemistry methodology to develop additional mixed alloyed BsubPcs. The methodology was to develop phthalonitrile intermediates that have numbers of hydrogen, chlorine and fluorine substitutions and to take them onto the formation of the BsubPc mixed alloys. This is ongoing and may have some aspects to outline during this presentation. We also do computational modelling to look into other relative impacts of the materials being developed, for example the HOMO and LUMO orbital distributions, the local ionization etc. This will also be outlined during this presentation. Figure 1

Fetched live from OpenAlex and de-inverted. Abstracts are not stored in this database: the inverted indexes are 8.6 GB of the frame’s 9.3 GB of text, and the host has 13 GB free.

How this classification was reachedexpand

Full frame machine prediction

Teacher imitation

Not calibrated prevalence, not ground truth. Human validation pending. The Gemma side is a direct model label for every work in the frame, read from the title-only record. The Codex side is a classifier learned from the 10,348 direct Codex labels and calibrated to design-weighted sample rates; fields without enough sample support carry no Codex call. Candidate is the union of the two sides; consensus is their intersection. These outputs are machine_predicted_unvalidated and are not human labels.

metaresearch head score (Codex)0.000
metaresearch head score (Gemma)0.000
Version: metacan-v3-hybrid-931329e0061cValidation status: machine_predicted_unvalidated
Candidate categoriesnone
Consensus categoriesnone
DomainCandidate signal: none · Consensus signal: none
Study designCandidate signal: Bench or experimental · Consensus signal: Bench or experimental
GenreCandidate signal: Empirical · Consensus signal: Empirical
Teacher disagreement score0.001
Threshold uncertainty score0.003

Distilled classifier scores by category (both heads)

CategoryCodexGemma
Metaresearch0.0000.000
Meta-epidemiology (narrow)0.0000.000
Meta-epidemiology (broad)0.0000.000
Bibliometrics0.0000.000
Science and technology studies0.0000.000
Scholarly communication0.0000.001
Open science0.0000.000
Research integrity0.0000.000
Insufficient payload (model declined to judge)0.0010.000

Machine scores (provisional)

The two teacher heads of the student model, read on this work. A score orders the frame for review; it never asserts a category, and the validation status ships verbatim with every row.

Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed, 7 training rounds). Scores rank; they never assert a category.

Opus teacher head0.016
GPT teacher head0.240
Teacher spread0.224 · how far apart the two teachers sit on this one work
Validation statusscore_only:v0-immature-baseline · verbatim from the scoring run: score_only means the number may rank works, and no category label ships from it

Classification

machine, unvalidated

Machine predicted; a candidate call from one source (direct Gemma or distilled Codex), not a consensus.

The models applied no category: nothing in the taxonomy fit this work.
Study designBench or experimental
Domainnot available
GenreEmpirical

How this classification was reached, model by model and score by score, is at the end of the page under "How this classification was reached".

Quick stats

Citations0
Published2023
Admission routes1
Has abstractyes

Explore more

Same venueECS Meeting AbstractsSame topicPorphyrin and Phthalocyanine ChemistryFrench-language works237,207