Hybridization Solution of Electrical Energy Demand Response and Forecasting Program by Using PSO-LSSVM Technique
Bibliographic record
Abstract
The ever-growing electricity market provides an excellent opportunity for the industrial sector to implement effective energy management through demand response (DR). The demand for poultry meat and eggs is expected to continue increasing with the growing population, leading to higher energy generation costs during peak periods. To overcome this challenge, a demand-side management (DSM) approach is put into action, which involves the use of DR schemes and diverse action strategies. The suggested study will optimize energy savings in the industrial sector and improve the sector’s power consumption profile. The study uses a particle swarm optimization (PSO) technique and a least square support vector machine (LSSVM) to forecast short-term load and optimize demand profiles under the Enhance Time of Use (ETOU) tariff scheme. The proposed formulation of the ETOU optimization achieves an energy cost savings of up to 7.57% (PSO) and 7.9S% (PSO-LSSVM), and the proposed models are intended to lower the cost of electrical energy usage across all price ranges. The study’s findings will assist manufacturers in transitioning to the ETOU tariff and contribute to the national DSM initiative program. Future research may examine other optimization algorithms and load forecasting models to refine ETOU tariff rate price reduction strategies and define available load for specific load management strategies.
Fetched live from OpenAlex and de-inverted. Abstracts are not stored in this database: the inverted indexes are 8.6 GB of the frame’s 9.3 GB of text, and the host has 13 GB free.
How this classification was reachedexpand
Full frame machine prediction
Teacher imitationNot calibrated prevalence, not ground truth. Human validation pending. The Gemma side is a direct model label for every work in the frame, read from the title-only record. The Codex side is a classifier learned from the 10,348 direct Codex labels and calibrated to design-weighted sample rates; fields without enough sample support carry no Codex call. Candidate is the union of the two sides; consensus is their intersection. These outputs are machine_predicted_unvalidated and are not human labels.
Distilled classifier scores by category (both heads)
| Category | Codex | Gemma |
|---|---|---|
| Metaresearch | 0.000 | 0.001 |
| Meta-epidemiology (narrow) | 0.001 | 0.000 |
| Meta-epidemiology (broad) | 0.001 | 0.001 |
| Bibliometrics | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Science and technology studies | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Scholarly communication | 0.001 | 0.000 |
| Open science | 0.001 | 0.000 |
| Research integrity | 0.001 | 0.001 |
| Insufficient payload (model declined to judge) | 0.002 | 0.000 |
Machine scores (provisional)
The two teacher heads of the student model, read on this work. A score orders the frame for review; it never asserts a category, and the validation status ships verbatim with every row.
Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed, 7 training rounds). Scores rank; they never assert a category.
score_only:v0-immature-baseline · verbatim from the scoring run: score_only means the number may rank works, and no category label ships from itClassification
machine, unvalidatedMachine predicted; a candidate call from one source (direct Gemma or distilled Codex), not a consensus.
How this classification was reached, model by model and score by score, is at the end of the page under "How this classification was reached".