MétaCan
Menu
Back to cohort
Record W4386867496 · doi:10.3917/rindu1.233.0075

La décarbonation de la place portuaire guyanaise à partir de la valorisation des sargasses

2023· article· fr· W4386867496 on OpenAlexaff
Philippe Lemoine

Bibliographic record

VenueAnnales des Mines - Réalités industrielles · 2023
Typearticle
Languagefr
FieldSocial Sciences
TopicMigration, Aging, and Tourism Studies
Canadian institutionsMinistère des Transports
Fundersnot available
KeywordsHumanitiesPolitical scienceArt

Abstract

fetched live from OpenAlex

Le Grand port maritime de la Guyane (GPM Guyane), établissement public de l’État, a été créé en 2013 pour gérer les installations portuaires de Dégrad des Cannes, sur la commune de Rémire Montjoly, et celles de Pariacabo, sur la commune de Kourou. L’objectif du GPM Guyane est d’accompagner le développement économique de la Guyane en facilitant les importations et les exportations, et ce en mettant ses installations portuaires à disposition de toute activité industrielle nécessitant des échanges par voie maritime, dans un contexte global de transition énergétique et écologique. Partant du constat d’un besoin de fertilisants pour l’agriculture guyanaise et de la nécessité de décarboner la plateforme portuaire, le GPM Guyane a lancé des recherches sur la possibilité de récolter, pour en tirer à la fois de l’engrais et de l’énergie, les sargasses au large des côtes, avant qu’elles n’aillent s’échouer sur celles de l’arc caribéen. Ces transformations nécessitent une production d’électrons verts à partir de la méthanisation des sargasses, de panneaux solaires photovoltaïques et de l’énergie osmotique.

Fetched live from OpenAlex and de-inverted. Abstracts are not stored in this database: the inverted indexes are 8.6 GB of the frame’s 9.3 GB of text, and the host has 13 GB free.

How this classification was reachedexpand

Full frame machine prediction

Teacher imitation

Not calibrated prevalence, not ground truth. Human validation pending. The Gemma side is a direct model label for every work in the frame, read from the title-only record. The Codex side is a classifier learned from the 10,348 direct Codex labels and calibrated to design-weighted sample rates; fields without enough sample support carry no Codex call. Candidate is the union of the two sides; consensus is their intersection. These outputs are machine_predicted_unvalidated and are not human labels.

metaresearch head score (Codex)0.001
metaresearch head score (Gemma)0.000
Version: metacan-v3-hybrid-931329e0061cValidation status: machine_predicted_unvalidated
Candidate categoriesnone
Consensus categoriesnone
DomainCandidate signal: none · Consensus signal: none
Study designCandidate signal: Not applicable · Consensus signal: none
GenreCandidate signal: Other · Consensus signal: none
Teacher disagreement score0.066
Threshold uncertainty score0.131

Distilled classifier scores by category (both heads)

CategoryCodexGemma
Metaresearch0.0010.000
Meta-epidemiology (narrow)0.0010.000
Meta-epidemiology (broad)0.0000.001
Bibliometrics0.0010.001
Science and technology studies0.0020.001
Scholarly communication0.0030.001
Open science0.0010.002
Research integrity0.0010.001
Insufficient payload (model declined to judge)0.0060.001

Machine scores (provisional)

The two teacher heads of the student model, read on this work. A score orders the frame for review; it never asserts a category, and the validation status ships verbatim with every row.

Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed, 7 training rounds). Scores rank; they never assert a category.

Opus teacher head0.061
GPT teacher head0.343
Teacher spread0.281 · how far apart the two teachers sit on this one work
Validation statusscore_only:v0-immature-baseline · verbatim from the scoring run: score_only means the number may rank works, and no category label ships from it

Classification

machine, unvalidated

Machine predicted; a candidate call from one source (direct Gemma or distilled Codex), not a consensus.

The models applied no category: nothing in the taxonomy fit this work.
Study designNot applicable
Domainnot available
GenreOther

How this classification was reached, model by model and score by score, is at the end of the page under "How this classification was reached".

Quick stats

Citations0
Published2023
Admission routes1
Has abstractyes

Explore more

Same venueAnnales des Mines - Réalités industriellesSame topicMigration, Aging, and Tourism StudiesFrench-language works237,207