Efficient Quantum Algorithm for All Quantum Wavelet Transforms
Bibliographic record
Abstract
Wavelet transforms are widely used in various fields of science and engineering as a mathematical tool with features that reveal information ignored by the Fourier transform. Unlike the Fourier transform, which is unique, a wavelet transform is specified by a sequence of numbers associated with the type of wavelet used and an order parameter specifying the length of the sequence. While the quantum Fourier transform, a quantum analog of the classical Fourier transform, has been pivotal in quantum computing, prior works on quantum wavelet transforms~(QWTs) were limited to the second and fourth order of a particular wavelet, the Daubechies wavelet. Here we develop a simple yet efficient quantum algorithm for executing any wavelet transform on a quantum computer. Our approach is to decompose the kernel matrix of a wavelet transform as a linear combination of unitaries (LCU) that are compilable by easy-to-implement modular quantum arithmetic operations and use the LCU technique to construct a probabilistic procedure to implement a QWT with a \textit{known} success probability. We then use properties of wavelets to make this approach deterministic by a few executions of the amplitude amplification strategy. We extend our approach to a multilevel wavelet transform and a generalized version, the packet wavelet transform, establishing computational complexities in terms of three parameters: the wavelet order $M$, the dimension $N$ of the transformation matrix, and the transformation level $d$. We show the cost is logarithmic in $N$, linear in $d$ and superlinear in $M$. Moreover, we show the cost is independent of $M$ for practical applications. Our proposed quantum wavelet transforms could be used in quantum computing algorithms in a similar manner to their well-established counterpart, the quantum Fourier transform.
Fetched live from OpenAlex and de-inverted. Abstracts are not stored in this database: the inverted indexes are 8.6 GB of the frame’s 9.3 GB of text, and the host has 13 GB free.
How this classification was reachedexpand
Full frame machine prediction
Teacher imitationNot calibrated prevalence, not ground truth. Human validation pending. The Gemma side is a direct model label for every work in the frame, read from the title-only record. The Codex side is a classifier learned from the 10,348 direct Codex labels and calibrated to design-weighted sample rates; fields without enough sample support carry no Codex call. Candidate is the union of the two sides; consensus is their intersection. These outputs are machine_predicted_unvalidated and are not human labels.
Distilled classifier scores by category (both heads)
| Category | Codex | Gemma |
|---|---|---|
| Metaresearch | 0.001 | 0.004 |
| Meta-epidemiology (narrow) | 0.001 | 0.000 |
| Meta-epidemiology (broad) | 0.001 | 0.001 |
| Bibliometrics | 0.001 | 0.001 |
| Science and technology studies | 0.001 | 0.001 |
| Scholarly communication | 0.002 | 0.002 |
| Open science | 0.001 | 0.002 |
| Research integrity | 0.001 | 0.002 |
| Insufficient payload (model declined to judge) | 0.012 | 0.003 |
Machine scores (provisional)
The two teacher heads of the student model, read on this work. A score orders the frame for review; it never asserts a category, and the validation status ships verbatim with every row.
Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed, 7 training rounds). Scores rank; they never assert a category.
score_only:v0-immature-baseline · verbatim from the scoring run: score_only means the number may rank works, and no category label ships from itClassification
machine, unvalidatedMachine predicted; a candidate call from one source (direct Gemma or distilled Codex), not a consensus.
How this classification was reached, model by model and score by score, is at the end of the page under "How this classification was reached".