MétaCan
Menu
Back to cohort
Record W4386886275 · doi:10.1136/gutjnl-2023-basl.10

O10 TNF signalling associated with high risk compared to low risk disease in primary biliary cholangitis: a transcriptomic analysis of peripheral immune cells

2023· article· en· W4386886275 on OpenAlexaff
Victoria Mulcahy, Jose‐Ezequiel Martín, Janeane Hails, Richard Sandford, David Jones, Gideon M. Hirschfield, George Mells

Bibliographic record

VenueOral Presentations · 2023
Typearticle
Languageen
FieldMedicine
TopicLiver Diseases and Immunity
Canadian institutionsToronto Liver CentreUniversity Health Network
Fundersnot available
KeywordsImmune systemPeripheralTranscriptomeMedicineDiseaseTumor necrosis factor alphaInternal medicineImmunologyBiologyGeneGene expression

Abstract

fetched live from OpenAlex

Primary biliary cholangitis (PBC) is an immune-mediated inflammatory disorder of the interlobular bile ducts which leads in many cases to cirrhosis. In patients with PBC, inadequate biochemical response to first-line treatment with ursodeoxycholic acid (UDCA) identifies those at high risk of progressive liver disease. In this study, we used transcriptional profiling of peripheral immune cells to gain insight into the immunobiology of high- vs. low-risk disease. We performed bulk RNA-sequencing of monocytes, NK cells, CD4+ T cells, CD8+ T cells, and B cells isolated from the peripheral blood of 40 treatment-naïve PBC patients; 36 high-risk patients (ALP ≥1.67 times the upper limit of normal [ULN] despite treatment with UDCA); 32 low-risk patients (ALP <1×ULN on UDCA); and 32 matched controls. We used Weighted Gene Co-expression Network Analysis (WGCNA) to identify networks of co-expressed genes (“modules”) associated with high-risk, low-risk or any PBC, and the most highly connected genes (“hub genes”) within them. Finally, we performed Multi-Omics Factor Analysis (MOFA) of WGCNA modules to identify the principal axes of biological variation (“latent factors”) across all immune cell subsets. We identified modules associated with high-risk, low-risk, or any PBC patient (q < 0.05) in each PBMC subset. Hub genes and functional annotations suggested that: (1) CD4+ T cells, CD8+ T cells and monocytes are active in PBC patients irrespective of disease activity, with enrichment of genes involved in TNF, IL-2, IL-6, and INFγ signalling, amongst other pathways; and (2) TNF signalling, implicated in all five cell types studied, is associated with high risk compared to low risk disease. Using MOFA, we identified one latent factor which bridged all cell types; was heavily weighted for modules enriched for TNF signalling; and showed significant difference in high compared to low risk disease (q < 0.05). Using this approach we found evidence of pro-inflammatory signalling in all stages of PBC disease irrespective of high-risk or low-risk disease and we identified TNF signalling as key in high risk compared to low risk disease.

Fetched live from OpenAlex and de-inverted. Abstracts are not stored in this database: the inverted indexes are 8.6 GB of the frame’s 9.3 GB of text, and the host has 13 GB free.

How this classification was reachedexpand

Full frame machine prediction

Teacher imitation

Not calibrated prevalence, not ground truth. Human validation pending. The Gemma side is a direct model label for every work in the frame, read from the title-only record. The Codex side is a classifier learned from the 10,348 direct Codex labels and calibrated to design-weighted sample rates; fields without enough sample support carry no Codex call. Candidate is the union of the two sides; consensus is their intersection. These outputs are machine_predicted_unvalidated and are not human labels.

metaresearch head score (Codex)0.000
metaresearch head score (Gemma)0.000
Version: metacan-v3-hybrid-931329e0061cValidation status: machine_predicted_unvalidated
Candidate categoriesnone
Consensus categoriesnone
DomainCandidate signal: none · Consensus signal: none
Study designCandidate signal: Observational · Consensus signal: Observational
GenreCandidate signal: Empirical · Consensus signal: Empirical
Teacher disagreement score0.001
Threshold uncertainty score0.003

Distilled classifier scores by category (both heads)

CategoryCodexGemma
Metaresearch0.0000.000
Meta-epidemiology (narrow)0.0000.000
Meta-epidemiology (broad)0.0000.000
Bibliometrics0.0000.001
Science and technology studies0.0000.000
Scholarly communication0.0000.000
Open science0.0000.000
Research integrity0.0000.000
Insufficient payload (model declined to judge)0.0010.000

Machine scores (provisional)

The two teacher heads of the student model, read on this work. A score orders the frame for review; it never asserts a category, and the validation status ships verbatim with every row.

Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed, 7 training rounds). Scores rank; they never assert a category.

Opus teacher head0.017
GPT teacher head0.269
Teacher spread0.252 · how far apart the two teachers sit on this one work
Validation statusscore_only:v0-immature-baseline · verbatim from the scoring run: score_only means the number may rank works, and no category label ships from it

Classification

machine, unvalidated

Machine predicted; a candidate call from one source (direct Gemma or distilled Codex), not a consensus.

The models applied no category: nothing in the taxonomy fit this work.
Study designObservational
Domainnot available
GenreEmpirical

How this classification was reached, model by model and score by score, is at the end of the page under "How this classification was reached".

Quick stats

Citations0
Published2023
Admission routes1
Has abstractyes

Explore more

Same venueOral PresentationsSame topicLiver Diseases and ImmunityFrench-language works237,207