Estética do pensamento: uma introdução à semiótica de C. S. Peirce
Why this work is in the frame
A frame that forgets how it found something cannot be audited. These are the routes that admitted this work.
Bibliographic record
Abstract
This article addresses the notion of sign developed by C. S. Peirce. We are evoking its semiotic system in an intertwined way, which is always repeated in recurrence, since semiotics is a logical system that, at its core, studies signs and their relationships. By stating that everything is a sign, what is meant with it is that the meaning contained in an idea can be transmitted to any interpretant. Therefore, semiotics is contained in the phenomenological plane of Peirce's philosophy, and it has the capacity to establish general interpretative relations about reality. In this way, everything that can be said or thought is logically semiotics, that is, it is a sign. We present the conceptualization and classification of the types of signs described by Peirce, highlighting the counterpoints between the standardized (usual) ideas and the Peircean proposal, regarding the relationship that exists between these three terms: sign-object-representative.
Fetched live from OpenAlex and de-inverted. Abstracts are not stored in this database: the inverted indexes are 8.6 GB of the frame’s 9.3 GB of text, and the host has 13 GB free.
Full frame distilled prediction
Teacher imitationNot calibrated prevalence, not ground truth. Human validation pending. Learned from the 10,348 direct Codex labels and 10,348 direct Gemma labels. Candidate is the union of thresholded teacher heads; consensus is their intersection. These outputs are machine_predicted_unvalidated and are not human labels or direct frontier model labels.
Codex and Gemma teacher scores by category
| Category | Codex | Gemma |
|---|---|---|
| Metaresearch | 0.001 | 0.000 |
| Meta-epidemiology (narrow) | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Meta-epidemiology (broad) | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Bibliometrics | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Science and technology studies | 0.001 | 0.000 |
| Scholarly communication | 0.001 | 0.000 |
| Open science | 0.001 | 0.000 |
| Research integrity | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Insufficient payload (model declined to judge) | 0.007 | 0.009 |
Machine scores (provisional)
The two teacher heads of the student model, read on this work. A score orders the frame for review; it never asserts a category, and the validation status ships verbatim with every row.
Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed, 7 training rounds). Scores rank; they never assert a category.
score_only:v0-immature-baseline · verbatim from the scoring run: score_only means the number may rank works, and no category label ships from it