MétaCan
Menu
Back to cohort
Record W4386887363 · doi:10.1101/2023.09.19.558329

Single cell decoding of drug induced transcriptomic reprogramming in triple negative breast cancers

2023· preprint· en· W4386887363 on OpenAlexafffund
Farhia Kabeer, Hoa Tran, Mirela Andronescu, Gurdeep Singh, Hakwoo Lee, Sohrab Salehi, Justina Biele, Jazmine Brimhall, David Gee, Viviana Cerda, Ciara H. O’Flanagan, Teresa Ruiz de Algara, Takako Kono, Sean Beatty, Elena Zaikova, Daniel Lai, Eric Lee, Richard A. Moore, Andrew J. Mungall, Marc Williams, Andrew Roth, Kieran R. Campbell, Sohrab P. Shah, Samuel Aparício

Bibliographic record

VenuebioRxiv (Cold Spring Harbor Laboratory) · 2023
Typepreprint
Languageen
FieldBiochemistry, Genetics and Molecular Biology
TopicSingle-cell and spatial transcriptomics
Canadian institutionsLunenfeld-Tanenbaum Research InstituteUniversity of TorontoCanada's Michael Smith Genome Sciences CentreUniversity of British Columbia
FundersCanadian Cancer Society Research InstituteCanadian Institutes of Health ResearchBC Cancer FoundationCancer Research UKBreast Cancer Research Foundation
KeywordsBiologyCopy-number variationTriple-negative breast cancerTranscriptomeBreast cancerReprogrammingGene dosageCancer researchGeneticsGeneCancerGene expressionGenome

Abstract

fetched live from OpenAlex

Abstract Background The encoding of cell intrinsic resistance states in breast cancer reflects the contributions of genomic and non-genomic variation. However, identifying the potential contributions of each requires accurate measurement and subtraction of the contribution of clonal fitness from co-measurement of transcriptional states. Somatic genomic variation in gene dosage, copy number variation, is the dominant mutational mechanism in breast cancer contributing to transcriptional variation and has recently been shown to contribute to platinum chemotherapy resistance states. Here we deploy time series measurements of triple negative breast cancer single cell transcriptomes in conjunction with co-measured single cell copy number associated clonal fitness to identify the contributions of genomic and non-genomic mechanisms to drug associated transcription states. Results We generated serial scRNA-seq data (126,556 cells) from triple negative breast cancer (TNBC) patient-derived xenograft (PDX) experiments over 2.5 years in duration, and matched it against genomic copy number single cell data from the same biological samples. We show that the cell memory of transcriptional states of TNBC tumors serially exposed to platinum identifies distinct clonal responses within individual tumours. Copy-number clones with high drug fitness leading to clonal sweeps exhibit less transcriptional reversion, whereas clones with weak drug fitness exhibit highly dynamic transcription on drug withdrawal. Pathway analysis shows that copy number associated and copy number independent transcripts converge on epithelial-mesenchymal transition (EMT) and cytokine signaling states associated with resistance. We show from trajectory analysis that transcriptional reversion exhibits hysteresis, indicating that new intermediate transcriptional states are generated by platinum exposure. Conclusions We discovered that copy number clones with strong genotype associated fitness under platinum became fixed in their states, resulting in minimal transcriptional reversion on drug withdrawal. In contrast clones with weaker fitness undergo non-genomic transcriptional plasticity and these distinct responses co-exist within single tumours. Together the data suggest that copy number associated and copy number independent transcriptional states may contribute to platinum drug resistance within individual tumours. The dominance of genomic or non-genomic mechanisms within individual polyclonal tumours has implications for approaches to restoration of drug sensitivity and re-treatment strategies. Data availability Uploaded Data URL: https://ega-archive.org/studies/EGAS00001007242 Github manuscript: https://github.com/molonc/drug_resistant_material/

Fetched live from OpenAlex and de-inverted. Abstracts are not stored in this database: the inverted indexes are 8.6 GB of the frame’s 9.3 GB of text, and the host has 13 GB free.

How this classification was reachedexpand

Full frame distilled prediction

Teacher imitation

Not calibrated prevalence, not ground truth. Human validation pending. Learned from the 10,348 direct Codex labels and 10,348 direct Gemma labels. Candidate is the union of thresholded teacher heads; consensus is their intersection. These outputs are machine_predicted_unvalidated and are not human labels or direct frontier model labels.

metaresearch head score (Codex)0.001
metaresearch head score (Gemma)0.000
Version: codex-gemma-dda1882f352aValidation status: machine_predicted_unvalidated
Candidate categoriesMeta-epidemiology (narrow)
Consensus categoriesnone
DomainCandidate signal: none · Consensus signal: none
Study designCandidate signal: Bench or experimental · Consensus signal: Bench or experimental
GenreCandidate signal: Empirical · Consensus signal: Empirical
Teacher disagreement score0.005
Threshold uncertainty score1.000

Codex and Gemma teacher scores by category

CategoryCodexGemma
Metaresearch0.0010.000
Meta-epidemiology (narrow)0.0010.001
Meta-epidemiology (broad)0.0010.000
Bibliometrics0.0000.001
Science and technology studies0.0000.000
Scholarly communication0.0000.000
Open science0.0010.000
Research integrity0.0010.001
Insufficient payload (model declined to judge)0.0000.000

Machine scores (provisional)

The two teacher heads of the student model, read on this work. A score orders the frame for review; it never asserts a category, and the validation status ships verbatim with every row.

Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed, 7 training rounds). Scores rank; they never assert a category.

Opus teacher head0.022
GPT teacher head0.226
Teacher spread0.204 · how far apart the two teachers sit on this one work
Validation statusscore_only:v0-immature-baseline · verbatim from the scoring run: score_only means the number may rank works, and no category label ships from it

Classification

machine, unvalidated

Machine predicted; a candidate call from one teacher head, not a consensus.

Study designBench or experimental
Domainnot available
GenreEmpirical

How this classification was reached, model by model and score by score, is at the end of the page under "How this classification was reached".

Quick stats

Citations1
Published2023
Admission routes2
Has abstractyes

Explore more

Same venuebioRxiv (Cold Spring Harbor Laboratory)Same topicSingle-cell and spatial transcriptomicsFrench-language works237,207