MétaCan
Menu
Back to cohort
Record W4386892578 · doi:10.1142/s0218127423501298

A Simple Model of Tumor-Immune Interaction: The Effect of Antigen Delay

2023· article· en· W4386892578 on OpenAlexafffund
Jianquan Li, Yuming Chen, Hui Cao, Dian Zhang, Peijun Zhang

Bibliographic record

VenueInternational Journal of Bifurcation and Chaos · 2023
Typearticle
Languageen
FieldMathematics
TopicMathematical Biology Tumor Growth
Canadian institutionsWilfrid Laurier University
FundersNatural Sciences and Engineering Research Council of CanadaNational Natural Science Foundation of China
KeywordsHopf bifurcationMathematicsControl theory (sociology)Stability (learning theory)BifurcationHomoclinic orbitComputer simulationSimple (philosophy)InstabilityStatistical physicsPhysicsComputer scienceNonlinear systemMechanicsControl (management)

Abstract

fetched live from OpenAlex

We propose a simple model of tumor-immune interactions, which involves effector cells and tumor cells. In the model, the stimulation delay of tumor antigen in the immune system is incorporated. We investigate the dynamical behavior of the model via theoretic analysis and numerical simulations. The saddle-node bifurcation can occur in both cases with and without delay. In contrast to the case without delay, stimulation delay may result in some complex dynamical behaviors and biological phenomena. In the presence of delay, conditions on absolute/conditional stability of equilibria and the existence of Hopf bifurcations are obtained. We further discuss the effect of the tumor on the switch between absolute stability and conditional stability. Numerical simulations also show the existence of homoclinic bifurcation and the dependence of the asymptotic state of the tumor progression on initial conditions for different delay values. Effects of delay on the dynamics of the model and on the region of tumor extinction are illustrated by simulations with different sets of parameter values. Finally, the corresponding biological implications are demonstrated.

Fetched live from OpenAlex and de-inverted. Abstracts are not stored in this database: the inverted indexes are 8.6 GB of the frame’s 9.3 GB of text, and the host has 13 GB free.

How this classification was reachedexpand

Full frame distilled prediction

Teacher imitation

Not calibrated prevalence, not ground truth. Human validation pending. Learned from the 10,348 direct Codex labels and 10,348 direct Gemma labels. Candidate is the union of thresholded teacher heads; consensus is their intersection. These outputs are machine_predicted_unvalidated and are not human labels or direct frontier model labels.

metaresearch head score (Codex)0.001
metaresearch head score (Gemma)0.001
Version: codex-gemma-dda1882f352aValidation status: machine_predicted_unvalidated
Candidate categoriesnone
Consensus categoriesnone
DomainCandidate signal: none · Consensus signal: none
Study designCandidate signal: Theoretical or conceptual · Consensus signal: Theoretical or conceptual
GenreCandidate signal: Empirical · Consensus signal: Empirical
Teacher disagreement score0.191
Threshold uncertainty score0.211

Codex and Gemma teacher scores by category

CategoryCodexGemma
Metaresearch0.0010.001
Meta-epidemiology (narrow)0.0000.000
Meta-epidemiology (broad)0.0000.000
Bibliometrics0.0000.000
Science and technology studies0.0000.000
Scholarly communication0.0000.000
Open science0.0000.000
Research integrity0.0000.000
Insufficient payload (model declined to judge)0.0000.000

Machine scores (provisional)

The two teacher heads of the student model, read on this work. A score orders the frame for review; it never asserts a category, and the validation status ships verbatim with every row.

Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed, 7 training rounds). Scores rank; they never assert a category.

Opus teacher head0.034
GPT teacher head0.343
Teacher spread0.308 · how far apart the two teachers sit on this one work
Validation statusscore_only:v0-immature-baseline · verbatim from the scoring run: score_only means the number may rank works, and no category label ships from it

Classification

machine, unvalidated

Machine predicted; a candidate call from one teacher head, not a consensus.

The models applied no category: nothing in the taxonomy fit this work.
Study designTheoretical or conceptual
Domainnot available
GenreEmpirical

How this classification was reached, model by model and score by score, is at the end of the page under "How this classification was reached".

Quick stats

Citations3
Published2023
Admission routes2
Has abstractyes

Explore more

Same venueInternational Journal of Bifurcation and ChaosSame topicMathematical Biology Tumor GrowthFrench-language works237,207