MétaCan
Menu
Back to cohort
Record W4386893730 · doi:10.4000/episteme.16345

La musique des sphères dans l’Angleterre prémoderne : permanence et questionnement d’un héritage théorique

2023· article· fr· W4386893730 on OpenAlexaff
Claire Bardelmann

Bibliographic record

VenueÉtudes Épistémè · 2023
Typearticle
Languagefr
FieldSocial Sciences
TopicHistorical and Literary Studies
Canadian institutionsMusée de la Civilisation
Fundersnot available
KeywordsArtHumanities

Abstract

fetched live from OpenAlex

Cet article s’intéresse au phénomène d’érosion de la musique spéculative comme cadre épistémologique dans l’Angleterre de la première modernité. Il propose de conduire cette étude à travers une sélection de traités de musique échelonnés entre la fin du XVIe siècle et le dernier tiers du XVIIe siècle. Ce corpus montre que l’Angleterre épouse la remise en cause de la musique des sphères, mais forme aussi une des arrière-gardes de sa permanence, à travers les exemples des traités de Robert Fludd (Utriusque Cosmi,1617), de Thomas Morley (A Plain and Easie Introduction to Practicall Music, 1599) et de Thomas Mace (Musick’s Monument, 1676).

Fetched live from OpenAlex and de-inverted. Abstracts are not stored in this database: the inverted indexes are 8.6 GB of the frame’s 9.3 GB of text, and the host has 13 GB free.

How this classification was reachedexpand

Full frame machine prediction

Teacher imitation

Not calibrated prevalence, not ground truth. Human validation pending. The Gemma side is a direct model label for every work in the frame, read from the title-only record. The Codex side is a classifier learned from the 10,348 direct Codex labels and calibrated to design-weighted sample rates; fields without enough sample support carry no Codex call. Candidate is the union of the two sides; consensus is their intersection. These outputs are machine_predicted_unvalidated and are not human labels.

metaresearch head score (Codex)0.003
metaresearch head score (Gemma)0.004
Version: metacan-v3-hybrid-931329e0061cValidation status: machine_predicted_unvalidated
Candidate categoriesnone
Consensus categoriesnone
DomainCandidate signal: none · Consensus signal: none
Study designCandidate signal: Theoretical or conceptual · Consensus signal: Theoretical or conceptual
GenreCandidate signal: Empirical · Consensus signal: none
Teacher disagreement score0.012
Threshold uncertainty score0.048

Distilled classifier scores by category (both heads)

CategoryCodexGemma
Metaresearch0.0030.004
Meta-epidemiology (narrow)0.0000.000
Meta-epidemiology (broad)0.0000.000
Bibliometrics0.0020.002
Science and technology studies0.0070.048
Scholarly communication0.0080.009
Open science0.0010.005
Research integrity0.0020.003
Insufficient payload (model declined to judge)0.0060.001

Machine scores (provisional)

The two teacher heads of the student model, read on this work. A score orders the frame for review; it never asserts a category, and the validation status ships verbatim with every row.

Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed, 7 training rounds). Scores rank; they never assert a category.

Opus teacher head0.033
GPT teacher head0.298
Teacher spread0.266 · how far apart the two teachers sit on this one work
Validation statusscore_only:v0-immature-baseline · verbatim from the scoring run: score_only means the number may rank works, and no category label ships from it

Classification

machine, unvalidated

Machine predicted; a candidate call from one source (direct Gemma or distilled Codex), not a consensus.

The models applied no category: nothing in the taxonomy fit this work.
Study designTheoretical or conceptual
Domainnot available
GenreEmpirical

How this classification was reached, model by model and score by score, is at the end of the page under "How this classification was reached".

Quick stats

Citations0
Published2023
Admission routes1
Has abstractyes

Explore more

Same venueÉtudes ÉpistémèSame topicHistorical and Literary StudiesFrench-language works237,207