A novel SW-ESIW slot antenna and its applications in millimeter-wave array design
Bibliographic record
Abstract
A novel structure of slot antenna with high gain and compact size for millimeter-wave (mmW) applications is proposed. This is the first attempt to apply slow-wave substrate integrated waveguide (SW-ESIW) to the field of antennas and their arrays. Two slot antenna arrays were designed, fabricated and measured. The measured results are in agreement with the simulation. The removal of dielectric substrate improves the radiation gain. At the same time, the slow wave effect, by means of physical separation of electric and magnetic fields, decreases both the lateral and longitudinal dimensions of the antenna. The SW-ESIW slot antenna can achieve miniaturization while retaining the advantages of high gain of ESIW. The 1 × 4-slot array shows a measured −10 dB bandwidth of 16% (30.5–35.8 GHz) with a measured maximum gain of 11.69 dB. The 4 × 4-slot array achieves a measured −10 dB bandwidth of 7.6% from 31.6 to 34.1 GHz with a measured peak gain of 18.75 dB. In addition, during the operating band, the radiation pattern is stable. Compared with the previously structures, the proposed SW-ESIW antenna structure has a better trade-off between gain and footprint. It can be flexibly adjusted to adapt to different requirements. These performances ensure that the antenna array based on the proposed structure is a promising candidate for millimeter-wave wireless applications including the fifth-generation mobile communications.
Fetched live from OpenAlex and de-inverted. Abstracts are not stored in this database: the inverted indexes are 8.6 GB of the frame’s 9.3 GB of text, and the host has 13 GB free.
How this classification was reachedexpand
Full frame distilled prediction
Teacher imitationNot calibrated prevalence, not ground truth. Human validation pending. Learned from the 10,348 direct Codex labels and 10,348 direct Gemma labels. Candidate is the union of thresholded teacher heads; consensus is their intersection. These outputs are machine_predicted_unvalidated and are not human labels or direct frontier model labels.
Codex and Gemma teacher scores by category
| Category | Codex | Gemma |
|---|---|---|
| Metaresearch | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Meta-epidemiology (narrow) | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Meta-epidemiology (broad) | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Bibliometrics | 0.000 | 0.001 |
| Science and technology studies | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Scholarly communication | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Open science | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Research integrity | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Insufficient payload (model declined to judge) | 0.000 | 0.000 |
Machine scores (provisional)
The two teacher heads of the student model, read on this work. A score orders the frame for review; it never asserts a category, and the validation status ships verbatim with every row.
Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed, 7 training rounds). Scores rank; they never assert a category.
score_only:v0-immature-baseline · verbatim from the scoring run: score_only means the number may rank works, and no category label ships from itClassification
machine, unvalidatedMachine predicted; a candidate call from one teacher head, not a consensus.
How this classification was reached, model by model and score by score, is at the end of the page under "How this classification was reached".