New and previously known ectoparasitic monogenoids (Platyhelminthes) on native and non-native fishes from tributaries of the Usumacinta River basin (southern Mexico), a Neotropical transition zone
Bibliographic record
Abstract
During a research on morphological diversity of gill ectoparasites on native and non-native fishes from tributaries (Palizada, El Recreo and Lacantún rivers) of the Usumacinta River Basin in the states of Campeche, Tabasco, and Chiapas (southern Mexico), the following monogenoids were found: Icelanonchohaptor tropicalis n. sp. on Usumacinta buffalo Ictiobus meridionalis (Günther, 1868) (Catostomidae); Heteropriapulus simplexiodes n. sp. and Heteropriapulus heterotylioides n. sp. on catfishes Pterygoplichthys pardalis (Castelnau, 1855) (Loricariidae) (type host) and Pterygoplichthys disyunctivus (Weber, 1991); Ligictaluridus mirabilis (Mueller 1937; Klassen and Beverley-Burton1985 from the southern blue catfish Ictalurus meridionalis (Günther, 1864) (Ictaluridae); Aristocleidus mexicanus Mendoza-Franco and Vidal-Martínez, 2001 on Eugerres mexicanus (Steindachner, 1863) (Gerreidae) (all monogenoidean species in the Dactylogyridae); and Diplectanocotyla megalopis Rakotofiringa and Oliver1987 (Diplectanidae) on tarpon Megalops atlanticus Valenciennes, 1847 (Megalopidae). The new species of Icelanonchohaptor and Heteropriapulus are herein described for the first time from a native catostomid and non-native Pterygoplichthys spp., respectively. While I. tropicalis n. sp. and L. mirabilis are morphologically comparable with their congeners from the Nearctic (i.e., United States and Canada), all other monogenoids exhibited Neotropical affinities. Present study shown that the gill monogenoids on native and non-native fishes in the Neotropical Mexican transition zone of the Usumacinta River basin are equally represented by species with Nearctic and Neotropical affinities including those adapted to freshwater environment in this area from marine ancestry.
Fetched live from OpenAlex and de-inverted. Abstracts are not stored in this database: the inverted indexes are 8.6 GB of the frame’s 9.3 GB of text, and the host has 13 GB free.
How this classification was reachedexpand
Full frame machine prediction
Teacher imitationNot calibrated prevalence, not ground truth. Human validation pending. The Gemma side is a direct model label for every work in the frame, read from the title-only record. The Codex side is a classifier learned from the 10,348 direct Codex labels and calibrated to design-weighted sample rates; fields without enough sample support carry no Codex call. Candidate is the union of the two sides; consensus is their intersection. These outputs are machine_predicted_unvalidated and are not human labels.
Distilled classifier scores by category (both heads)
| Category | Codex | Gemma |
|---|---|---|
| Metaresearch | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Meta-epidemiology (narrow) | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Meta-epidemiology (broad) | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Bibliometrics | 0.002 | 0.001 |
| Science and technology studies | 0.001 | 0.000 |
| Scholarly communication | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Open science | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Research integrity | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Insufficient payload (model declined to judge) | 0.002 | 0.000 |
Machine scores (provisional)
The two teacher heads of the student model, read on this work. A score orders the frame for review; it never asserts a category, and the validation status ships verbatim with every row.
Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed, 7 training rounds). Scores rank; they never assert a category.
score_only:v0-immature-baseline · verbatim from the scoring run: score_only means the number may rank works, and no category label ships from itClassification
machine, unvalidatedMachine predicted; a candidate call from one source (direct Gemma or distilled Codex), not a consensus.
How this classification was reached, model by model and score by score, is at the end of the page under "How this classification was reached".