RANet: a custom CNN model and quanvolutional neural network for the automated detection of rheumatoid arthritis in hand thermal images
Bibliographic record
Abstract
Rheumatoid arthritis is an autoimmune disease which affects the small joints. Early prediction of RA is necessary for the treatment and management of the disease. The current work presents a deep learning and quantum computing-based automated diagnostic approach for RA in hand thermal imaging. The study's goals are (i) to develop a custom RANet model and compare its performance with the pretrained models and quanvolutional neural network (QNN) to distinguish between the healthy subjects and RA patients, (ii) To validate the performance of the custom model using feature selection method and classification using machine learning (ML) classifiers. The present study developed a custom RANet model and employed pre-trained models such as ResNet101V2, InceptionResNetV2, and DenseNet201 to classify the RA patients and normal subjects. The deep features extracted from the RA Net model are fed into the ML classifiers after the feature selection process. The RANet model, RA Net+ SVM, and QNN model produced an accuracy of 95%, 97% and 93.33% respectively in the classification of healthy groups and RA patients. The developed RANet and QNN models based on thermal imaging could be employed as an accurate automated diagnostic tool to differentiate between the RA and control groups.
Fetched live from OpenAlex and de-inverted. Abstracts are not stored in this database: the inverted indexes are 8.6 GB of the frame’s 9.3 GB of text, and the host has 13 GB free.
How this classification was reachedexpand
Full frame machine prediction
Teacher imitationNot calibrated prevalence, not ground truth. Human validation pending. The Gemma side is a direct model label for every work in the frame, read from the title-only record. The Codex side is a classifier learned from the 10,348 direct Codex labels and calibrated to design-weighted sample rates; fields without enough sample support carry no Codex call. Candidate is the union of the two sides; consensus is their intersection. These outputs are machine_predicted_unvalidated and are not human labels.
Distilled classifier scores by category (both heads)
| Category | Codex | Gemma |
|---|---|---|
| Metaresearch | 0.000 | 0.001 |
| Meta-epidemiology (narrow) | 0.001 | 0.000 |
| Meta-epidemiology (broad) | 0.000 | 0.001 |
| Bibliometrics | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Science and technology studies | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Scholarly communication | 0.000 | 0.001 |
| Open science | 0.001 | 0.000 |
| Research integrity | 0.001 | 0.001 |
| Insufficient payload (model declined to judge) | 0.002 | 0.000 |
Machine scores (provisional)
The two teacher heads of the student model, read on this work. A score orders the frame for review; it never asserts a category, and the validation status ships verbatim with every row.
Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed, 7 training rounds). Scores rank; they never assert a category.
score_only:v0-immature-baseline · verbatim from the scoring run: score_only means the number may rank works, and no category label ships from itClassification
machine, unvalidatedMachine predicted; a candidate call from one source (direct Gemma or distilled Codex), not a consensus.
How this classification was reached, model by model and score by score, is at the end of the page under "How this classification was reached".