MétaCan
Menu
Back to cohort
Record W4386914460 · doi:10.3389/fped.2023.1247343

Case report: Blotchy skin in a puffy neonate: is there a new association?

2023· article· en· W4386914460 on OpenAlexaff
Chacko Joseph, Arijit Lodha, Soumya Thomas, Essa Al Awad, Nicola Wright, Cora Constantinescu, Doan Le, Majeeda Kamaluddeen

Bibliographic record

VenueFrontiers in Pediatrics · 2023
Typearticle
Languageen
FieldMedicine
TopicLymphatic Disorders and Treatments
Canadian institutionsAlberta Children's HospitalUniversity of AlbertaUniversity of CalgaryAlberta Health Services
Fundersnot available
KeywordsPurpura fulminansMedicineGangreneSurgeryEtiologyDermatologyPediatricsPathology

Abstract

fetched live from OpenAlex

Introduction: Purpura fulminans in the neonatal population is a rare but potentially life-threatening condition complicated by thrombosis, resultant vital organ necrosis, and gangrene of the extremities. Considering the rapid evolution of the pathogenetic mechanism, an index of suspicion, early identification, and prompt intervention are imperative for improved outcomes. The majority of purpura fulminans cases have an infectious etiology, but it is essential to consider other congenital and acquired causes. Case description: gene, and the occurrence of retinal detachment in both eyes. After draining the congenital chylothorax, the neonate developed purpura fulminans due to a loss of protein C, S, and antithrombin factors, previously not reported in the literature. The purpuric lesions resolved after the administration of fresh frozen plasma. Subsequently, no recurring purpura fulminans lesions were noted following the normalization of the antithrombotic factor levels in the serum. Subsequently, the child also developed retinal detachment in both eyes.

Fetched live from OpenAlex and de-inverted. Abstracts are not stored in this database: the inverted indexes are 8.6 GB of the frame’s 9.3 GB of text, and the host has 13 GB free.

How this classification was reachedexpand

Full frame distilled prediction

Teacher imitation

Not calibrated prevalence, not ground truth. Human validation pending. Learned from the 10,348 direct Codex labels and 10,348 direct Gemma labels. Candidate is the union of thresholded teacher heads; consensus is their intersection. These outputs are machine_predicted_unvalidated and are not human labels or direct frontier model labels.

metaresearch head score (Codex)0.000
metaresearch head score (Gemma)0.000
Version: codex-gemma-dda1882f352aValidation status: machine_predicted_unvalidated
Candidate categoriesnone
Consensus categoriesnone
DomainCandidate signal: none · Consensus signal: none
Study designCandidate signal: Observational · Consensus signal: Observational
GenreCandidate signal: Empirical · Consensus signal: Empirical
Teacher disagreement score0.173
Threshold uncertainty score0.620

Codex and Gemma teacher scores by category

CategoryCodexGemma
Metaresearch0.0000.000
Meta-epidemiology (narrow)0.0000.000
Meta-epidemiology (broad)0.0000.000
Bibliometrics0.0010.002
Science and technology studies0.0000.000
Scholarly communication0.0000.000
Open science0.0000.000
Research integrity0.0000.000
Insufficient payload (model declined to judge)0.0000.000

Machine scores (provisional)

The two teacher heads of the student model, read on this work. A score orders the frame for review; it never asserts a category, and the validation status ships verbatim with every row.

Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed, 7 training rounds). Scores rank; they never assert a category.

Opus teacher head0.011
GPT teacher head0.263
Teacher spread0.252 · how far apart the two teachers sit on this one work
Validation statusscore_only:v0-immature-baseline · verbatim from the scoring run: score_only means the number may rank works, and no category label ships from it

Classification

machine, unvalidated

Machine predicted; a candidate call from one teacher head, not a consensus.

The models applied no category: nothing in the taxonomy fit this work.
Study designObservational
Domainnot available
GenreEmpirical

How this classification was reached, model by model and score by score, is at the end of the page under "How this classification was reached".

Quick stats

Citations3
Published2023
Admission routes1
Has abstractyes

Explore more

Same venueFrontiers in PediatricsSame topicLymphatic Disorders and TreatmentsFrench-language works237,207