MétaCan
Menu
Back to cohort

Identification of Cooking ADL Actions Through Analysis of Thermal Camera Video

2023· article· en· W4386919579 on OpenAlexafffund
Emma Boulay, Jonathan Mack, Christian Ratsamany, Abeer Rafiq, Bruce Wallace, Frank Knoefel

Bibliographic record

Venuenot available
Typearticle
Languageen
FieldEngineering
TopicNon-Invasive Vital Sign Monitoring
Canadian institutionsCarleton University
FundersNatural Sciences and Engineering Research Council of CanadaAGE-WELL
KeywordsIdentification (biology)Computer scienceComputer visionComputer graphics (images)Artificial intelligenceMultimedia

Abstract

fetched live from OpenAlex

Kitchen use and nutrition are fundamental to well-being and independence for aging adults. Good nutrition enables healthy aging and is necessary for good health, while poor nutrition can lead to health decline. These declines can themselves lead to a reduced meal preparation ability or complexity resulting in continued poor nutrition. Meal preparation is an important Activity of Daily Living (ADL), and this work proposes a method to analyze thermal video for stove top cooking with a method to identify flip events within meal preparation. Flip events are unique to the cooking of some food types and identification allows this cooking behaviour to be assessed. The method applies image processing techniques to the thermal video to identify the food items within the pan and proposes a method to identify flips. A balanced set of cooking recordings that include flip and non-flip events were used and the method provides a sensitivity of 100% and a positive predictive value of 74%. The method can augment kitchen activity of daily living monitoring of cooking habits of aging adults and can assist care givers and clinicians in assessing the changes in the older adult.

Fetched live from OpenAlex and de-inverted. Abstracts are not stored in this database: the inverted indexes are 8.6 GB of the frame’s 9.3 GB of text, and the host has 13 GB free.

How this classification was reachedexpand

Full frame machine prediction

Teacher imitation

Not calibrated prevalence, not ground truth. Human validation pending. The Gemma side is a direct model label for every work in the frame, read from the title-only record. The Codex side is a classifier learned from the 10,348 direct Codex labels and calibrated to design-weighted sample rates; fields without enough sample support carry no Codex call. Candidate is the union of the two sides; consensus is their intersection. These outputs are machine_predicted_unvalidated and are not human labels.

metaresearch head score (Codex)0.000
metaresearch head score (Gemma)0.001
Version: metacan-v3-hybrid-931329e0061cValidation status: machine_predicted_unvalidated
Candidate categoriesnone
Consensus categoriesnone
DomainCandidate signal: none · Consensus signal: none
Study designCandidate signal: Observational · Consensus signal: none
GenreCandidate signal: Empirical · Consensus signal: Empirical
Teacher disagreement score0.002
Threshold uncertainty score0.006

Distilled classifier scores by category (both heads)

CategoryCodexGemma
Metaresearch0.0000.001
Meta-epidemiology (narrow)0.0000.000
Meta-epidemiology (broad)0.0000.000
Bibliometrics0.0020.001
Science and technology studies0.0000.000
Scholarly communication0.0010.000
Open science0.0000.000
Research integrity0.0000.000
Insufficient payload (model declined to judge)0.0020.001

Machine scores (provisional)

The two teacher heads of the student model, read on this work. A score orders the frame for review; it never asserts a category, and the validation status ships verbatim with every row.

Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed, 7 training rounds). Scores rank; they never assert a category.

Opus teacher head0.028
GPT teacher head0.277
Teacher spread0.249 · how far apart the two teachers sit on this one work
Validation statusscore_only:v0-immature-baseline · verbatim from the scoring run: score_only means the number may rank works, and no category label ships from it

Classification

machine, unvalidated

Machine predicted; a candidate call from one source (direct Gemma or distilled Codex), not a consensus.

The models applied no category: nothing in the taxonomy fit this work.
Study designObservational
Domainnot available
GenreEmpirical

How this classification was reached, model by model and score by score, is at the end of the page under "How this classification was reached".

Quick stats

Citations1
Published2023
Admission routes2
Has abstractyes

Explore more

Same topicNon-Invasive Vital Sign MonitoringFrench-language works237,207