Bibliographic record
Abstract
This work is an updated revision of semiclassical descriptions for the electron, including the fully relativistic QED-P model from H. J. Wilson based on the original Dirac equation (DE). The models presented hereafter go beyond the depiction of the electron as a structureless nondimensional point like charge with momentum and position determined by a probabilistic interpretation of the wavefunction described in terms of an electronic density cloud. These models share features in common that provide useful insights concerning the nature of the electron; for instance, they all consider zitterbewegung, a light speed “trembling-along-the-way” electron motion, to be a real oscillatory motion of the electron. The last model presented in this review is the electron mass model from Val Baker et al. [Phys. Essays 32, 255 (2019)], where the electron mass is defined in terms of a holographic surface-to-volume ratio Φ and the relationship of the electric charge at the Planck scale to that at the electron scale, obtaining a value in agreement with the latest CODATA value. We discuss the relationship between these models. The large number of correspondences between the models should not be taken lightly and indicate, in our view, that something very fundamental about the nature of the electron is being put forward by this study.
Fetched live from OpenAlex and de-inverted. Abstracts are not stored in this database: the inverted indexes are 8.6 GB of the frame’s 9.3 GB of text, and the host has 13 GB free.
How this classification was reachedexpand
Full frame machine prediction
Teacher imitationNot calibrated prevalence, not ground truth. Human validation pending. The Gemma side is a direct model label for every work in the frame, read from the title-only record. The Codex side is a classifier learned from the 10,348 direct Codex labels and calibrated to design-weighted sample rates; fields without enough sample support carry no Codex call. Candidate is the union of the two sides; consensus is their intersection. These outputs are machine_predicted_unvalidated and are not human labels.
Distilled classifier scores by category (both heads)
| Category | Codex | Gemma |
|---|---|---|
| Metaresearch | 0.001 | 0.001 |
| Meta-epidemiology (narrow) | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Meta-epidemiology (broad) | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Bibliometrics | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Science and technology studies | 0.001 | 0.005 |
| Scholarly communication | 0.002 | 0.005 |
| Open science | 0.001 | 0.001 |
| Research integrity | 0.002 | 0.003 |
| Insufficient payload (model declined to judge) | 0.004 | 0.001 |
Machine scores (provisional)
The two teacher heads of the student model, read on this work. A score orders the frame for review; it never asserts a category, and the validation status ships verbatim with every row.
Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed, 7 training rounds). Scores rank; they never assert a category.
score_only:v0-immature-baseline · verbatim from the scoring run: score_only means the number may rank works, and no category label ships from itClassification
machine, unvalidatedMachine predicted; a candidate call from one source (direct Gemma or distilled Codex), not a consensus.
How this classification was reached, model by model and score by score, is at the end of the page under "How this classification was reached".