La triple catastrophe japonaisedu 11 mars 2011
Why this work is in the frame
A frame that forgets how it found something cannot be audited. These are the routes that admitted this work.
Bibliographic record
Abstract
Cet article fait le point sur la méga-catastrophe japonaise du 11 mars 2011, d’abord le tremblement de terre de magnitude 9 suivi d’un gigantesque tsunami, et de l’accident nucléaire qui s’ensuivit à la centrale nucléaire de Fukushima Dai-ichi. Le tremblement de terre et le tsunami ont causé 28 000 pertes de vie et détruit un nombre considérable de bâtiments résidentiels et commerciaux. Il est encore trop tôt pour mesurer l’ampleur de la triple catastrophe et de son impact tant sur l’économie japonaise que sur le marché de l’assurance. Il est toutefois possible de décrire les premières démarches gouvernementales et de mesurer l’impact de cette catastrophe sur le marché mondial de la réassurance. Il est possible de tirer certaines conclusions préliminaires sur l’importance de se questionner sur la prévention des catastrophes naturelles et technologiques.
Fetched live from OpenAlex and de-inverted. Abstracts are not stored in this database: the inverted indexes are 8.6 GB of the frame’s 9.3 GB of text, and the host has 13 GB free.
Full frame distilled prediction
Teacher imitationNot calibrated prevalence, not ground truth. Human validation pending. Learned from the 10,348 direct Codex labels and 10,348 direct Gemma labels. Candidate is the union of thresholded teacher heads; consensus is their intersection. These outputs are machine_predicted_unvalidated and are not human labels or direct frontier model labels.
Codex and Gemma teacher scores by category
| Category | Codex | Gemma |
|---|---|---|
| Metaresearch | 0.001 | 0.000 |
| Meta-epidemiology (narrow) | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Meta-epidemiology (broad) | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Bibliometrics | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Science and technology studies | 0.000 | 0.002 |
| Scholarly communication | 0.000 | 0.001 |
| Open science | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Research integrity | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Insufficient payload (model declined to judge) | 0.009 | 0.002 |
Machine scores (provisional)
The two teacher heads of the student model, read on this work. A score orders the frame for review; it never asserts a category, and the validation status ships verbatim with every row.
Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed, 7 training rounds). Scores rank; they never assert a category.
score_only:v0-immature-baseline · verbatim from the scoring run: score_only means the number may rank works, and no category label ships from it