Exploring Structure Incentive Domain Adversarial Learning for Generalizable Sleep Stage Classification
Bibliographic record
Abstract
Sleep stage classification is crucial for sleep state monitoring and health interventions. In accordance with the standards prescribed by the American Academy of Sleep Medicine, a sleep episode follows a specific structure comprising five distinctive sleep stages that collectively form a sleep cycle. Typically, this cycle repeats about five times, providing an insightful portrayal of the subject’s physiological attributes. The progress of deep learning and advanced domain generalization methods allows automatic and even adaptive sleep stage classification. However, applying models trained with visible subject data to invisible subject data remains challenging due to significant individual differences among subjects. Motivated by the periodic category-complete structure of sleep stage classification, we propose a Structure Incentive Domain Adversarial learning (SIDA) method that combines the sleep stage classification method with domain generalization to enable cross-subject sleep stage classification. SIDA includes individual domain discriminators for each sleep stage category to decouple subject dependence differences among different categories and fine-grained learning of domain-invariant features. Furthermore, SIDA directly connects the label classifier and domain discriminators to promote the training process. Experiments on three benchmark sleep stage classification datasets demonstrate that the proposed SIDA method outperforms other state-of-the-art sleep stage classification and domain generalization methods and achieves the best cross-subject sleep stage classification results.
Fetched live from OpenAlex and de-inverted. Abstracts are not stored in this database: the inverted indexes are 8.6 GB of the frame’s 9.3 GB of text, and the host has 13 GB free.
How this classification was reachedexpand
Full frame machine prediction
Teacher imitationNot calibrated prevalence, not ground truth. Human validation pending. The Gemma side is a direct model label for every work in the frame, read from the title-only record. The Codex side is a classifier learned from the 10,348 direct Codex labels and calibrated to design-weighted sample rates; fields without enough sample support carry no Codex call. Candidate is the union of the two sides; consensus is their intersection. These outputs are machine_predicted_unvalidated and are not human labels.
Distilled classifier scores by category (both heads)
| Category | Codex | Gemma |
|---|---|---|
| Metaresearch | 0.002 | 0.004 |
| Meta-epidemiology (narrow) | 0.001 | 0.000 |
| Meta-epidemiology (broad) | 0.001 | 0.001 |
| Bibliometrics | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Science and technology studies | 0.000 | 0.001 |
| Scholarly communication | 0.001 | 0.001 |
| Open science | 0.001 | 0.001 |
| Research integrity | 0.001 | 0.002 |
| Insufficient payload (model declined to judge) | 0.001 | 0.000 |
Machine scores (provisional)
The two teacher heads of the student model, read on this work. A score orders the frame for review; it never asserts a category, and the validation status ships verbatim with every row.
Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed, 7 training rounds). Scores rank; they never assert a category.
score_only:v0-immature-baseline · verbatim from the scoring run: score_only means the number may rank works, and no category label ships from itClassification
machine, unvalidatedMachine predicted; a candidate call from one source (direct Gemma or distilled Codex), not a consensus.
How this classification was reached, model by model and score by score, is at the end of the page under "How this classification was reached".