MétaCan
Menu
Back to cohort
Record W4386928585 · doi:10.4187/respcare.11352

Evaluation of the Humidification Performances of New Generation of Heated Wire Humidifiers

2023· article· en· W4386928585 on OpenAlexaff
François Lellouche, Emilie Rousseau, Pierre-Alexandre Bouchard

Bibliographic record

VenueRespiratory Care · 2023
Typearticle
Languageen
FieldMedicine
TopicNosocomial Infections in ICU
Canadian institutionsInstitut universitaire de cardiologie et de pneumologie de Québec
Fundersnot available
KeywordsHumidifiersMedicineHumidityRelative humidityAnesthesiaSurgeryMaterials scienceEnvironmental scienceMeteorology

Abstract

fetched live from OpenAlex

BACKGROUND: At high ambient temperatures in ICU rooms, the humidification performances of heated-wire humidifiers are significantly reduced, with delivered gas humidity well below 30 mg H 2 O/L, which leads to an increased risk of endotracheal occlusions, subocclusions, or mucociliary dysfunction. The objective of the study was to evaluate the humidity delivered at the Y-piece with new-generation heated-wire humidifiers with advanced algorithm (FP950 [Fisher & Paykel Healthcare, Auckland, New Zealand] and VHB20 [Vincent Medical, Inspired, Hong Kong]) while varying ambient temperatures. METHODS: We measured, on the bench, the hygrometry of inspiratory gases delivered by a new generation of heated-wire humidifiers (i) FP950, (ii) VHB20 and a previous generation of heated-wire humidifiers, (iii) MR850 (Fisher & Paykel) with the usual settings (37°C at the chamber/40°C at the Y-piece), (iv) MR850 with no temperature gradient (40°C/40°C), and (v) MR850 with the automatic compensation algorithm activated. Hygrometry was measured with the psychrometric method after 1 h of stability while varying the room temperature from 20 to 30°C. RESULTS: Two hundred ninety-four hygrometric bench measurements were performed at steady state for the different tested conditions. With the new heated-wire humidifiers (FP950 and VHB20), gas humidity delivered remained > 30 mg H 2 O/L in all tested conditions, even at high ambient temperatures (>25°C). With previous generations of heated-wire humidifiers (MR850), at high ambient temperature, humidity delivered was adequate in only 26% (11/42) of the measurements when the usual settings were used (37°C/40°C) and 30% (11/37) with automatic compensation. When no temperature gradient was set (40°C/40°C), humidity delivered was > 30 mg H 2 O/L in 91% (30/33) of the measurements at a high ambient temperature. With an ambient temperature < 25°C, almost all devices and settings provided adequate humidity. CONCLUSIONS: The new FP950 and VHB20 heated-wire humidifiers by using advanced algorithms demonstrated stable performance while varying the ambient temperature by 20–30°C, better than the previous generation of heated humidifiers when ambient temperatures were high.

Fetched live from OpenAlex and de-inverted. Abstracts are not stored in this database: the inverted indexes are 8.6 GB of the frame’s 9.3 GB of text, and the host has 13 GB free.

How this classification was reachedexpand

Full frame distilled prediction

Teacher imitation

Not calibrated prevalence, not ground truth. Human validation pending. Learned from the 10,348 direct Codex labels and 10,348 direct Gemma labels. Candidate is the union of thresholded teacher heads; consensus is their intersection. These outputs are machine_predicted_unvalidated and are not human labels or direct frontier model labels.

metaresearch head score (Codex)0.001
metaresearch head score (Gemma)0.000
Version: codex-gemma-dda1882f352aValidation status: machine_predicted_unvalidated
Candidate categoriesnone
Consensus categoriesnone
DomainCandidate signal: none · Consensus signal: none
Study designCandidate signal: Bench or experimental · Consensus signal: Bench or experimental
GenreCandidate signal: Empirical · Consensus signal: Empirical
Teacher disagreement score0.028
Threshold uncertainty score0.216

Codex and Gemma teacher scores by category

CategoryCodexGemma
Metaresearch0.0010.000
Meta-epidemiology (narrow)0.0000.000
Meta-epidemiology (broad)0.0000.000
Bibliometrics0.0000.001
Science and technology studies0.0000.000
Scholarly communication0.0000.000
Open science0.0000.000
Research integrity0.0000.000
Insufficient payload (model declined to judge)0.0000.000

Machine scores (provisional)

The two teacher heads of the student model, read on this work. A score orders the frame for review; it never asserts a category, and the validation status ships verbatim with every row.

Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed, 7 training rounds). Scores rank; they never assert a category.

Opus teacher head0.199
GPT teacher head0.390
Teacher spread0.191 · how far apart the two teachers sit on this one work
Validation statusscore_only:v0-immature-baseline · verbatim from the scoring run: score_only means the number may rank works, and no category label ships from it

Classification

machine, unvalidated

Machine predicted; a candidate call from one teacher head, not a consensus.

The models applied no category: nothing in the taxonomy fit this work.
Study designBench or experimental
Domainnot available
GenreEmpirical

How this classification was reached, model by model and score by score, is at the end of the page under "How this classification was reached".

Quick stats

Citations9
Published2023
Admission routes1
Has abstractyes

Explore more

Same venueRespiratory CareSame topicNosocomial Infections in ICUFrench-language works237,207