MétaCan
Menu
Back to cohort
Record W4386934647 · doi:10.3389/fmars.2023.1200408

Wild salmon enumeration and monitoring using deep learning empowered detection and tracking

2023· article· en· W4386934647 on OpenAlexafffundabout
William I. Atlas, Sami Ma, Yi Ching Chou, Katrina Connors, Daniel J. Scurfield, B. Nam, Xiaoqiang Ma, Mark Cleveland, Janvier Doire, Jonathan W. Moore, Ryan Shea, Jiangchuan Liu

Bibliographic record

VenueFrontiers in Marine Science · 2023
Typearticle
Languageen
FieldEnvironmental Science
TopicFish Ecology and Management Studies
Canadian institutionsSkeena Fisheries CommissionDouglas CollegePacific Salmon FoundationSimon Fraser University
FundersNatural Sciences and Engineering Research Council of Canada
KeywordsFisheryFish migrationAbundance (ecology)Deep learningComputer scienceArtificial intelligenceObject detectionMetadataEnvironmental resource managementGeographyFish <Actinopterygii>Environmental scienceBiologyPattern recognition (psychology)World Wide Web

Abstract

fetched live from OpenAlex

Pacific salmon have experienced declining abundance and unpredictable returns, yet remain vital to livelihoods, food security, and cultures of coastal communities around the Pacific Rim, creating a need for reliable and timely monitoring to inform sustainable fishery management. Currently, spawning salmon abundance is often monitored with in-river video or sonar cameras. However, reviewing video for estimates of salmon abundance from these programs requires thousands of hours of staff time, and data are typically not available until after the fishing season is completed. Computer vision deep learning can enable rapid and reliable processing of data, with potentially transformative applications in salmon population assessment and fishery management. Working with two First Nations fishery programs in British Columbia, Canada, we developed, trained, and tested deep learning models to perform object detection and multi-object tracking for automated video enumeration of salmon passing two First Nation-run weirs. We gathered and annotated more than 500,000 frames of video data encompassing 12 species, including seven species of anadromous salmonids, and trained models for multi-object tracking and species detection. Our top performing model achieved a mean average precision (mAP) of 67.6%, and species-specific mAP scores &amp;gt; 90% for coho and &amp;gt; 80% for sockeye salmon when trained with a combined dataset of Kitwanga and Bear Rivers’ salmon annotations. We also tested and deployed a prototype for a real-time monitoring system that can perform computer vision deep learning analyses on site. Computer vision models and off-grid monitoring systems show promise for automated counting and species identification. A key future priority will be working with stewardship practitioners and fishery managers to apply salmon computer vision, testing and applying edge-capable computing solutions for in-situ analysis at remote sites, and developing tools for independent user-led computer vision analysis by non-computer scientists. These efforts can advance in-season monitoring and decision making to support adaptive management of sustainable wild salmon fisheries.

Fetched live from OpenAlex and de-inverted. Abstracts are not stored in this database: the inverted indexes are 8.6 GB of the frame’s 9.3 GB of text, and the host has 13 GB free.

How this classification was reachedexpand

Full frame distilled prediction

Teacher imitation

Not calibrated prevalence, not ground truth. Human validation pending. Learned from the 10,348 direct Codex labels and 10,348 direct Gemma labels. Candidate is the union of thresholded teacher heads; consensus is their intersection. These outputs are machine_predicted_unvalidated and are not human labels or direct frontier model labels.

metaresearch head score (Codex)0.001
metaresearch head score (Gemma)0.000
Version: codex-gemma-dda1882f352aValidation status: machine_predicted_unvalidated
Candidate categoriesnone
Consensus categoriesnone
DomainCandidate signal: none · Consensus signal: none
Study designCandidate signal: Observational · Consensus signal: Observational
GenreCandidate signal: Empirical · Consensus signal: Empirical
Teacher disagreement score0.066
Threshold uncertainty score0.433

Codex and Gemma teacher scores by category

CategoryCodexGemma
Metaresearch0.0010.000
Meta-epidemiology (narrow)0.0000.000
Meta-epidemiology (broad)0.0000.000
Bibliometrics0.0000.001
Science and technology studies0.0010.000
Scholarly communication0.0000.001
Open science0.0000.001
Research integrity0.0000.000
Insufficient payload (model declined to judge)0.0000.000

Machine scores (provisional)

The two teacher heads of the student model, read on this work. A score orders the frame for review; it never asserts a category, and the validation status ships verbatim with every row.

Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed, 7 training rounds). Scores rank; they never assert a category.

Opus teacher head0.010
GPT teacher head0.233
Teacher spread0.223 · how far apart the two teachers sit on this one work
Validation statusscore_only:v0-immature-baseline · verbatim from the scoring run: score_only means the number may rank works, and no category label ships from it

Classification

machine, unvalidated

Machine predicted; a candidate call from one teacher head, not a consensus.

The models applied no category: nothing in the taxonomy fit this work.
Study designObservational
Domainnot available
GenreEmpirical

How this classification was reached, model by model and score by score, is at the end of the page under "How this classification was reached".

Quick stats

Citations15
Published2023
Admission routes3
Has abstractyes

Explore more

Same venueFrontiers in Marine ScienceSame topicFish Ecology and Management StudiesFrench-language works237,207