MétaCan
Menu
Back to cohort
Record W4386937180 · doi:10.3917/resg.155.0221

Qualité des pratiques de gouvernance et lisibilité des rapports de rémunération des hauts dirigeants

2023· article· fr· W4386937180 on OpenAlexaboutno aff
Caroline Talbot, Michel Coulmont, Sylvie Berthelot

Bibliographic record

VenueRecherches en Sciences de Gestion · 2023
Typearticle
Languagefr
FieldBusiness, Management and Accounting
TopicCorporate Finance and Governance
Canadian institutionsnot available
Fundersnot available
KeywordsPolitical scienceHumanitiesArt

Abstract

fetched live from OpenAlex

Cette étude examine la qualité de la gouvernance et la lisibilité des rapports de rémunération des hauts dirigeants. Elle illustre aussi le conflit entre le dirigeant et l’agent de gouvernance. Les analyses ont été réalisées à partir d’un échantillon d’entreprises canadiennes inscrites à la Bourse de Toronto et incluses dans le classement du Corporate Governance Index du journal The Globe & Mail. L’étude est conduite sur un échantillon de 547 rapports de rémunération couvrant les années 2016 à 2018. Les résultats indiquent que la qualité des pratiques de gouvernance contribue à la lisibilité des rapports de rémunération. Code JEL: M480, M120, G380

Fetched live from OpenAlex and de-inverted. Abstracts are not stored in this database: the inverted indexes are 8.6 GB of the frame’s 9.3 GB of text, and the host has 13 GB free.

How this classification was reachedexpand

Full frame distilled prediction

Teacher imitation

Not calibrated prevalence, not ground truth. Human validation pending. Learned from the 10,348 direct Codex labels and 10,348 direct Gemma labels. Candidate is the union of thresholded teacher heads; consensus is their intersection. These outputs are machine_predicted_unvalidated and are not human labels or direct frontier model labels.

metaresearch head score (Codex)0.018
metaresearch head score (Gemma)0.007
Version: codex-gemma-dda1882f352aValidation status: machine_predicted_unvalidated
Candidate categoriesMeta-epidemiology (narrow)
Consensus categoriesnone
DomainCandidate signal: none · Consensus signal: none
Study designCandidate signal: Observational · Consensus signal: Observational
GenreCandidate signal: Empirical · Consensus signal: Empirical
Teacher disagreement score0.138
Threshold uncertainty score1.000

Codex and Gemma teacher scores by category

CategoryCodexGemma
Metaresearch0.0180.007
Meta-epidemiology (narrow)0.0000.000
Meta-epidemiology (broad)0.0000.000
Bibliometrics0.0000.003
Science and technology studies0.0010.001
Scholarly communication0.0010.005
Open science0.0010.000
Research integrity0.0000.000
Insufficient payload (model declined to judge)0.0000.000

Machine scores (provisional)

The two teacher heads of the student model, read on this work. A score orders the frame for review; it never asserts a category, and the validation status ships verbatim with every row.

Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed, 7 training rounds). Scores rank; they never assert a category.

Opus teacher head0.224
GPT teacher head0.388
Teacher spread0.164 · how far apart the two teachers sit on this one work
Validation statusscore_only:v0-immature-baseline · verbatim from the scoring run: score_only means the number may rank works, and no category label ships from it

Classification

machine, unvalidated

Machine predicted; a candidate call from one teacher head, not a consensus.

Study designObservational
Domainnot available
GenreEmpirical

How this classification was reached, model by model and score by score, is at the end of the page under "How this classification was reached".

Quick stats

Citations0
Published2023
Admission routes1
Has abstractyes

Explore more

Same venueRecherches en Sciences de GestionSame topicCorporate Finance and GovernanceFrench-language works237,207