MétaCan
Menu
Back to cohort
Record W4386937206 · doi:10.3917/resg.155.0317

Le partenariat public-privé : une externalisation discutée

2023· article· fr· W4386937206 on OpenAlexaff
Khaled Al Masri, Noureddine Menani

Bibliographic record

VenueRecherches en Sciences de Gestion · 2023
Typearticle
Languagefr
FieldSocial Sciences
TopicSocial Sciences and Governance
Canadian institutionsUniversité de Sherbrooke
Fundersnot available
KeywordsHumanitiesPolitical scienceMerge (version control)PhilosophyComputer science

Abstract

fetched live from OpenAlex

La personne publique, sous contrainte budgétaire, choisit d’externaliser afin de maîtriser les coûts. Nous observons que cet objectif n’est pas atteint. Cet article tente de rechercher la vraie légitimité d’un partenariat public-privé, en analysant le cas du Centre National des Sports de la Défense. Une étude qualitative basée sur des entretiens semi-directifs, un questionnaire et de l’observation non-participante a donné lieu au constat suivant : un intérêt pour les compétences émerge au détriment de la réduction budgétaire. Nous concluons que la recherche de l’amélioration de la qualité et le recentrage sur le cœur de métier permettent de légitimer le projet.

Fetched live from OpenAlex and de-inverted. Abstracts are not stored in this database: the inverted indexes are 8.6 GB of the frame’s 9.3 GB of text, and the host has 13 GB free.

How this classification was reachedexpand

Full frame distilled prediction

Teacher imitation

Not calibrated prevalence, not ground truth. Human validation pending. Learned from the 10,348 direct Codex labels and 10,348 direct Gemma labels. Candidate is the union of thresholded teacher heads; consensus is their intersection. These outputs are machine_predicted_unvalidated and are not human labels or direct frontier model labels.

metaresearch head score (Codex)0.016
metaresearch head score (Gemma)0.004
Version: codex-gemma-dda1882f352aValidation status: machine_predicted_unvalidated
Candidate categoriesScience and technology studies
Consensus categoriesnone
DomainCandidate signal: none · Consensus signal: none
Study designCandidate signal: Theoretical or conceptual · Consensus signal: Theoretical or conceptual
GenreCandidate signal: Empirical · Consensus signal: none
Teacher disagreement score0.581
Threshold uncertainty score0.999

Codex and Gemma teacher scores by category

CategoryCodexGemma
Metaresearch0.0160.004
Meta-epidemiology (narrow)0.0000.000
Meta-epidemiology (broad)0.0000.000
Bibliometrics0.0000.007
Science and technology studies0.0020.003
Scholarly communication0.0010.002
Open science0.0010.000
Research integrity0.0010.000
Insufficient payload (model declined to judge)0.0000.001

Machine scores (provisional)

The two teacher heads of the student model, read on this work. A score orders the frame for review; it never asserts a category, and the validation status ships verbatim with every row.

Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed, 7 training rounds). Scores rank; they never assert a category.

Opus teacher head0.360
GPT teacher head0.446
Teacher spread0.086 · how far apart the two teachers sit on this one work
Validation statusscore_only:v0-immature-baseline · verbatim from the scoring run: score_only means the number may rank works, and no category label ships from it

Classification

machine, unvalidated

Machine predicted; a candidate call from one teacher head, not a consensus.

Study designTheoretical or conceptual
Domainnot available
GenreEmpirical

How this classification was reached, model by model and score by score, is at the end of the page under "How this classification was reached".

Quick stats

Citations0
Published2023
Admission routes1
Has abstractyes

Explore more

Same venueRecherches en Sciences de GestionSame topicSocial Sciences and GovernanceFrench-language works237,207